Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-10 Thread Carlos Horowicz
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Carlos Horowicz wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:24:38AM +, Ian Eiloart wrote: >>> >>> >>> --On 7 February 2009 02:36:36 -0200 Carlos Horowicz >>> wrote: >>> I'm wondering what to do in a live sys

Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-09 Thread Carlos Horowicz
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:24:38AM +, Ian Eiloart wrote: >> >> >> --On 7 February 2009 02:36:36 -0200 Carlos Horowicz >> wrote: >> >>> I'm wondering what to do in a live system with may be hundreds of >>> thousands of these strange e-mail

Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-09 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:37:16PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:02:37PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > Ditto. Gosh. That makes 3 tunables. The gods of tunable > > non-proliferation will want my head for doing this: > > > > maxcacheheaders_warn = 500 > > maxcachehead

Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-09 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:02:37PM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote: > Ditto. Gosh. That makes 3 tunables. The gods of tunable > non-proliferation will want my head for doing this: > > maxcacheheaders_warn = 500 > maxcacheheaders_skip = 1000 (same as the current patch) > maxcacheheaders_reject = 2000

Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-09 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:24:38AM +, Ian Eiloart wrote: > > > --On 7 February 2009 02:36:36 -0200 Carlos Horowicz > wrote: > >> I'm wondering what to do in a live system with may be hundreds of >> thousands of these strange e-mails already in users´ mailboxes, My god, that many? Nuke it f

Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-09 Thread Ian Eiloart
--On 7 February 2009 02:36:36 -0200 Carlos Horowicz wrote: > I'm wondering what to do in a live system with may be hundreds of > thousands of these strange e-mails already in users´ mailboxes, > > Should imapd be patched so that it just ignores the repetitions , both > when building cyrus.cach

Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-06 Thread Carlos Horowicz
I'm wondering what to do in a live system with may be hundreds of thousands of these strange e-mails already in users´ mailboxes, Should imapd be patched so that it just ignores the repetitions , both when building cyrus.cache and when it returns the headers to a client ? or should imapd really mo

Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-06 Thread Carlos Horowicz
Hi the problem shows up no matter what client you use ... process name is imapd. Carlos On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Blake Hudson wrote: > > Original Message > Subject: Fwd: Huge header detection > From: Carlos Horowicz > To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu

Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-06 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:34:39PM -0200, Carlos Horowicz wrote: > Hi there, > > postfix author suggested me to post here following issue : > > we received a spam that bypassed all controls and consisted of a huge > header (4M) , repeating these four lines 31.000 times (chaning only > the Reply-T

Re: Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-06 Thread Blake Hudson
Original Message Subject: Fwd: Huge header detection From: Carlos Horowicz To: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu Date: Friday, February 06, 2009 12:34:39 PM > Hi there, > > postfix author suggested me to post here following issue : > > we received a spam th

Fwd: Huge header detection

2009-02-06 Thread Carlos Horowicz
Hi there, postfix author suggested me to post here following issue : we received a spam that bypassed all controls and consisted of a huge header (4M) , repeating these four lines 31.000 times (chaning only the Reply-To): MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Magaly