Re: Difference between ". list * %" and ". list * *"

2004-04-20 Thread Craig Ringer
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 23:17, Ken Murchison wrote: > Rob Mueller wrote: > > Sure, but should a 'list' command ever return the same mailbox name multiple > > times. It just seems wrong to me... > > > Oh, I missed that. I don't know why its doing that. Rob, is this > another side effect of recen

Re: Difference between ". list * %" and ". list * *"

2004-02-03 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > > Sure, but should a 'list' command ever return the same mailbox name multiple > > > times. It just seems wrong to me... > > > > > > Oh, I missed that. I don't know why its doing that. Rob, is this > > a

Re: Difference between ". list * %" and ". list * *"

2004-01-30 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Ken Murchison wrote: > > Sure, but should a 'list' command ever return the same mailbox name multiple > > times. It just seems wrong to me... > > > Oh, I missed that. I don't know why its doing that. Rob, is this > another side effect of recent changes, or has this always be

Re: Difference between ". list * %" and ". list * *"

2004-01-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Mueller wrote: You are getting very similar results because you are using "*" as the reference argument. Cyrus concatenates the reference and pattern. Try these and see the difference: . LIST "" * . LIST "" % Sure, but should a 'list' command ever return the same mailbox name multiple time

Re: Difference between ". list * %" and ". list * *"

2004-01-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Mueller wrote: You are getting very similar results because you are using "*" as the reference argument. Cyrus concatenates the reference and pattern. Try these and see the difference: . LIST "" * . LIST "" % Sure, but should a 'list' command ever return the same mailbox name multiple time

Re: Difference between ". list * %" and ". list * *"

2004-01-30 Thread Rob Mueller
> You are getting very similar results because you are using "*" as the > reference argument. Cyrus concatenates the reference and pattern. Try > these and see the difference: > > . LIST "" * > > . LIST "" % Sure, but should a 'list' command ever return the same mailbox name multiple times. It j

Re: Difference between ". list * %" and ". list * *"

2004-01-30 Thread Ken Murchison
Robert Mueller wrote: This is cyrus 2.2.3 with skiplist mailboxes db. Someone pointed this strange behaviour out to me... . list * * * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Folder1" * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX.Folder2" * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX.Folder2.Su

Difference between ". list * %" and ". list * *"

2004-01-30 Thread Robert Mueller
This is cyrus 2.2.3 with skiplist mailboxes db. Someone pointed this strange behaviour out to me... . list * * * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX" * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Folder1" * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX.Folder2" * LIST (\HasChildren) "." "INBOX.Folder2.SubFolder1" . list * %