Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-25 Thread Robert Mueller
I agree that a test suite is something that we need. I'll add this to our TODO list. As always, code contributions are always welcome. See below and attached, a copy of what I sent april '04. It's not great, but it's a start... Rob Hi Ken & Rob Given that there's currently no regre

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-25 Thread Patrick Radtke
On May 25, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Robert Mueller wrote:1. There's no regression testing with cyrus at all. I did try and start a cyrus regression test a while back (just a perl script to test basic IMAP functionality) but there wasn't really interest in taking it up. I still strongly believe that some f

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-25 Thread Ken Murchison
Patrick Radtke wrote: On May 25, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Robert Mueller wrote: 1. There's no regression testing with cyrus at all. I did try and start a cyrus regression test a while back (just a perl script to test basic IMAP functionality) but there wasn't really interest in taking it up. I stil

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Thu, 25 May 2006 08:43:46 -0400, "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > This hole mess is a result of me having my head up my ass. I usually do > pretty thorough testing of any code that I touch, and I *thought* that I > had done that with the CONDSTORE stuff. Its now obvious that I d

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-25 Thread Ken Murchison
Robert Mueller wrote: Is this a good spot to suggest branching from the last stable release (2.3.3 in this case) and just applying the bugfixes if HEAD is only half finished? 2.3 is beta branch. You want stable you go for 2.2. Beta is may be, but still 1. There's no regression testing

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-25 Thread Robert Mueller
Is this a good spot to suggest branching from the last stable release (2.3.3 in this case) and just applying the bugfixes if HEAD is only half finished? 2.3 is beta branch. You want stable you go for 2.2. Beta is may be, but still 1. There's no regression testing with cyrus at all. I di

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-25 Thread Mirosław Jaworski
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 17:56 +1000, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:44:42 -0400, "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > It looks like in my haste to make a release with the pop3d bugfix, it > > didn't do enough testing. I'm seeing the same thing here,and I'm > > working on

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-25 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:44:42 -0400, "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > It looks like in my haste to make a release with the pop3d bugfix, it > didn't do enough testing. I'm seeing the same thing here,and I'm > working on it. Is this a good spot to suggest branching from the last stab

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-24 Thread Ken Murchison
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:38:12 -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: accepted connection May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: lmtp connection preauth'd as postman May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: verif

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-24 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Ken Murchison wrote: Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:38:12 -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: accepted connection May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: lmtp connection preauth'd as postman May 24 01:03:55 ame

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-23 Thread Ken Murchison
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:38:12 -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: accepted connection May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: lmtp connection preauth'd as postman May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: verif

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-23 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:38:12 -0400 > Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: accepted connection > May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: lmtp connection preauth'd as > postman > May 24 01:03:55 ameno lmtpunix[37779]: verify_user

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-23 Thread Ken Murchison
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, On Tue, 23 May 2006 10:44:15 -0400 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: murch> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4. This is a murch> BETA-quality release, reflecting that it has significant numbers of new murch> features that have not been t

Re: Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-23 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Tue, 23 May 2006 10:44:15 -0400 > Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: murch> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4. This is a murch> BETA-quality release, reflecting that it has significant numbers of new murch> features that have not been tested on a wid

Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4 Released

2006-05-23 Thread Ken Murchison
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.4. This is a BETA-quality release, reflecting that it has significant numbers of new features that have not been tested on a wide-scale basis, although earlier versions of this code have been running at several sites for quite some time.