--On Monday, November 20, 2000 11:34:15 AM +1100 Tristan Ball
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note: this is not something I have tried, or even wish to, as my largest
> cyrus email server handles 250 users at the moment, easily handled by a
> Sun E450. :-)
>
> I've seen the messages poo-pooing us
> My understanding is that Cyrus IMAPD itself is designed as a central
> mailboxes (a special kind of files, in a way) server.
Yes.
> So it makes little sense to put the mailboxes themselves on a different
The only place I think it might make sense is on cheap large scale
servers. In particular
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Tristan Ball wrote:
> Note: this is not something I have tried, or even wish to, as my largest
> cyrus email server handles 250 users at the moment, easily handled by a
> Sun E450. :-)
>
> I've seen the messages poo-pooing using NFS for cyrus, and the reasons
> make sense, m
Note: this is not something I have tried, or even wish to, as my largest
cyrus email server handles 250 users at the moment, easily handled by a
Sun E450. :-)
I've seen the messages poo-pooing using NFS for cyrus, and the reasons
make sense, my question is would another shared filesystem, like
sa
