Re: "reconstruct -r" usage

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Ringer
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 22:20, John Conant wrote: > Hi, > > Sort of a side note - we started having trouble like that. Turned > out that our overnight antivirus scan of the mail store would find a virus, > and quarantine (move!) the infected file, thus messing up the Cyrus > indexing.

Re: "reconstruct -r" usage

2004-04-16 Thread Craig Ringer
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 22:58, Craig Ringer wrote: A message in which he failed to actually attach the file he was talking about. It's attached this time, as text/plain so that overzealous mail scanners don't remove it. Craig Ringer #!/bin/bash # # /var/tmp/scan/clamout is a file containg the outp

Re: "reconstruct -r" usage

2004-04-16 Thread John Conant
Hi, Sort of a side note - we started having trouble like that.  Turned out that our overnight antivirus scan of the mail store would find a virus, and quarantine (move!) the infected file, thus messing up the Cyrus indexing.  Now we schedule a system-wide reconstruct after the virus scan,

Re: "reconstruct -r" usage

2004-04-16 Thread Eli Cantu
Thanks, but I must have a different version or something, here's what i get when i run that. localhost.localdomain> reconstruct -r -f user.chris usage: reconstruct [-r] mailbox so that second line is telling me that my usage is incorrect. I cannot use the -f or the -m flag, and even though -r doe

"reconstruct -r" usage

2004-04-15 Thread Eli Cantu
Hello all, If I am trying to reconstruct user.chris.Sent and user.chris.Save, should I be able to simply run: "reconstruct -r user.chris"? If so, it does not seem to work. I have to manually reconstruct every single subdirectory. If I misunderstood the "-r" option, what is it used for? thanks,