Re: Please change the DNS lookup = defaultdomain process, and use defaultdomain as the default domain.

Not sure if this helps, but, you might wanna take a look at this post/thread and bugzilla entry: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/2006-October/023811.html https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2886 It's hard to tell from your post exactly what you want to achieve. Howev

appenddomain patch

Hi, Attached is a patch for a new option called "appenddomain". This patch works differently than the virtdomain option in the configuration, so it's not replicating existing behavior. If there's a better idea on how to do something like this, please let me know. Explanation follows. It seems the

Re: How to enable Sieve Filter for vacation

Sujit Choudhury wrote: Thanks very much. Getting somewhere now. But we have modified cyrus default of user.johndoe to user/johndoe, i.e. changed the dot to / In the logfile we get: duplicate_mark: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]1092842175 0 As if it is still expecting mail filesystem

Re: How to enable Sieve Filter for vacation

Sujit Choudhury wrote: We are running cyrus+postfix on a SuSE Linux box. We have the following file in: /usr/sieve/e/example And the ingo.script in that directory contains the following: require "vacation"; # Blacklisted Addresses # Vacation Message vacation :days 1 :addresses "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Remote User's SMTP relay authorization

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Phil Brutsche wrote: > Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > The only problem you might have with "on the road" is that ISP's tend > > to block outbound port 25 access, and rightly so, to avoid > > worm/virus/spam propagation. I got around that b

Re: Remote User's SMTP relay authorization

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, John Gibson wrote: > I have a sales team which needs to be able to use a SMTP relay while "on > the road". There is a " TLS > patch by > Lutz Jaenicke." to Postfix which seems like it might be a good solution. > T

Re: Webmail?

Etienne Goyer wrote: I run Horde/IMP with Cyrus-imapd successfully, but I would not dare call it "fairly simple". Config is actually quite complicated, but it support most of Cyrus features (Sieve, ACL, quota, etc). Feel free to ask any question you might have about my setup. Ok... what version o

Re: Antivirus solution

Amavis-NG or even amavis-new. Something that'll do SMTP filtering. Then, set "content_filter = smtp:localhost:10025" somewhere in the main configuration, and set up a listener on localhost 10026 to receive mail back, but force it not to have a content filter. Anyways, this is all well documented so

Re: Performance problems, compared to wu-imapd

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > I always thought it was configurable to do do that... uw's cclient library > > can read a bunch of different format mailboxes so I figured uw-imapd would > > be able to re

Re: Performance problems, compared to wu-imapd

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > stores it's messages. If you configured sendmail and uw-imap to store it's > > messages in maildir format (which I believe you can), then you'd have a > > real

Re: Performance problems, compared to wu-imapd

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Tuomas Toropainen wrote: > The problem is that wu-imapd seems to perform much better than cyrus. > Cyrus version is 2.1.16, compiled with default database options. Syslog is > not logging debug messages, and has synchronous logging disabled (-). Both > systems have 500 test us

RE: Web based password updating...

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Adam Gover wrote: > I figure ill just do the passwd rip to insert the user names into the > database without actually creating the inbox, then once the password is > set auto create the inbox for them... That should work pretty well > actually... Why rip? That could take for

Re: Web based password updating...

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Adam Gover wrote: > Im not too sure if this is the correct list for this or not so please > excuse me if I have misdirected this. > > Im in the process of migrating my departments internal mail system to a > cyrus/postfix combo. Our current system is simply using /etc/shadow

Re: individual User spamassassin settings during lmtp delivery

Just wanted to chime in on this thread and note that this also answers Nick Fisher's question of why I do my setup (multiple instances of postfix) the way I do. On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Romeo Benzoni wrote: > Start Header! > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 16:24, James A. Pattie wrote: > > Start Header! > > --

Re: Cyrus and Postfix question

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Nick Fisher wrote: > Intresting I'm not too hot on the specifics of lmtp (I only half read > the rfc today) Where are you taking the user name from? Was it much of > a hack to get that working? Are the spampd maintainers intrested in > adopting the hack or doing someth

Re: Missing cyrus-IMAP-2.2.x imapd.conf.5.html

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Eric S. Pulley wrote: > Not a big deal but sometime in the 2.2.x builds the HTMLized imapd.conf(5) > seams to have went missing from the doc/man directory. I noticed this the other night and meant to mention something, but I've been a bit busy. I would've mentioned something

Re: Is Reiserfs better than ext3

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Oliver Jones wrote: > Speaking of FS corruption. In the past I've had corruption occur with > Reiser FS for no readily apparent reason. I've never had the same thing > happen with ext2. And until recently I've never had it happen with > ext3. Recently though I did have a w

Re: Cyrus and Postfix question

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Joakim Ryden wrote: > And if one is happy and things are working one should stick with it of > course. :) > > I was just trying to point out that if you're handling a fairly large > amount of e-mail and from Postfix are calling wrapper+spamc+running > spamd+deliver chances

Re: imap migration (fwd)

Sorry about that... To all that mentioned "just copy the spool over", that isn't possible for me. I'm running 2.1.something with virtual domains support through an lmtp hack that let me have "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as the mailbox name. So, I can't just bring it over. But thanks anyways :-) Besides,

imap migration tools

Hi folks, I've just set up a new machine and have everything working almost exactly the way I want. I am at the last stage of migrating off an old system. I often see discussions here about which tools people need to do a proper migration from one server to another, but apparently my search foo

Re: [POLL] Cyrus 2.2 virtdomains behavior (Was: global admin without defaultdomain?)

On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Paul Boven wrote: > Christos Soulios wrote: > > > Security is one thing. More than this, my opinion is that in order cyrus > > to be deployed in a true multi domain environment, and thus actually be > > used by ISPs, admins must be able to distribute the virtual domains > >

Re: global admin without defaultdomain?

On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Igor Brezac wrote: > On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Igor Brezac wrote: > > > > > This would be correct only if there is a bug. There is no bug here, but > > > rather a misconfiguration on your part

Re: [POLL] Cyrus 2.2 virtdomains behavior (Was: global admin without defaultdomain?)

Sweeet, but I think i'll wait till the next full release to test it, since the target system is sorta production. Thanks :-) -peace On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > Ken Murchison wrote: > > > Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > >

Re: global admin without defaultdomain?

On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Igor Brezac wrote: > On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Christian Schulte wrote: > > > > > Since you enabled virtdomains why do you still want unqualified logins > > > if not due upgrading reasons from

Re: more virtual domain funnyness

On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > I c... so that means that global admins have to have unqualified > > usernames, which are then qualified with the default domain? If that's the > > case, then global

Re: more virtual domain funnyness

On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Christian Schulte wrote: > Kendrick Vargas schrieb: > > > > Ok, Igor, Ken, you both must be growing to hate me, but I'm starting to > > understand the present need for the defaultdomain paramater. I'm sorry :-) > > > >

Re: global admin without defaultdomain?

On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Christian Schulte wrote: > Since you enabled virtdomains why do you still want unqualified logins > if not due upgrading reasons from an old installation with unqualified > logins ? This all only has to do with unqualified logins which I do not > want/need except for the gl

more virtual domain funnyness

Hi folks, Ok, Igor, Ken, you both must be growing to hate me, but I'm starting to understand the present need for the defaultdomain paramater. I'm sorry :-) I have a question. Lets say I have a realm "example.com" and I have the defaultdomain paramater set to "example.com", and I also have "doma

Re: global admin without defaultdomain?

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Igor Brezac wrote: > On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Igor Brezac wrote: > > > > > > configdirectory: /opt/var/imap > > > > partition-default: /opt/var/spool/imap > > > > admins: [EM

Re: global admin without defaultdomain?

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Christian Schulte wrote: > Kendrick Vargas schrieb: > > > > I tried adding "defaultdomain: fakedomain.com" and even setting > > "servername: fakedomain.com" without it making a difference. Any other > > suggestions? > &g

Re: [POLL] Cyrus 2.2 virtdomains behavior (Was: global admin without defaultdomain?)

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I asked earlier how I could get users within the primary (default) domain > > hashed into the domain/ subdirectories of the imap spool instead of being > > right at

Re: global admin without defaultdomain?

On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Igor Brezac wrote: > On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > Doesn't seem to work. If I set a fake domain, cyrus just checks the user > > against the hostname of the machine, or some truncated form of it. I can > > see this cuz I am us

Re: global admin without defaultdomain?

On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Igor Brezac wrote: > On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Kendrick Vargas wrote: > > > I asked earlier how I could get users within the primary (default) domain > > hashed into the domain/ subdirectories of the imap spool instead of being > > right at the toplevel

global admin without defaultdomain?

Hi folks, I asked earlier how I could get users within the primary (default) domain hashed into the domain/ subdirectories of the imap spool instead of being right at the toplevel without any real domain association. I was told that the defaultdomain option was meant to ease the passage from ve

2.2.2.2.2.2 BETA default domain question

Hi folks :-) First of all a BIG thank you to all who are working on Cyrus. It's a great product and it's made my life much easier! Thanks guys! Now for my question... I've been playing with Cyrus 2.2.2-BETA because I need the virtual domain stuff it's got. However I noticed that no matter what

alpha tarball or cvs?

Hi folks, I'm setting up a new box and I'm planning on switching from 2.1.13 to one of the 2.2.0 alphas, either out of cvs or from the tarball on the ftp site. I imagine since the tarball on the FTP site was created (according to the ftp site) in march, the cvs is gonna have a number less bugs.

Re: looking for Cyrus mail format documentation

I've been sorta following this thread, and I don't claim to know a whole lot about programming, but I'm wondering why something simple like what I'm about to suggest wouldn't work... Here goes: If a group of servers are gonna be in constant communication, why not just have each server assign UI

Re: unix:lmtp vs /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver ?

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Thomas Hannan wrote: > Thanks for the clarification. i have to admit that I'd never worked with LMTP > before I undertook this project... > > Anyways, with the AMaViS virus filtering, could you clarify a bit? Does your > MX point to an AMaViS server which then forwards to

Re: unix:lmtp vs /usr/cyrus/bin/deliver ?

On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Thomas Hannan wrote: > Are there any performance/security issues using one method versus the > other? Would one offer me greater flexibility in doing spam filtering (via > regex and/or blacklists), antivirus checking, etc? > > We handle mail for 3 domains, and don't have anyt

Re: Antivirus

On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Sebastien Marmorat wrote: > What is the best antivirus solution for my mail server Cyrus/Postfix ? I use AMaViS acting as a SMTP filter for postfix. AMaViS is configured to use F-Prot and Clam AntiVirus for it's virus engines, though it can support many others. Specifically

Re: Cyrus IMAP ; case studies, success stories, ... I need them

On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 04:37:21PM +0100, Piet Ruyssinck wrote: > If you're running Cyrus for a reasonably sized company or institution, > please let me know, including the hardware you're using, number of > (simultaneous) users, level of satisfaction, and other useful > information. Maybe we co

Re: Add mailbox automatically

On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Kervin L. Pierre wrote: > I am working on some PHP scripts to manage mailboxes and I have to use > passthough calls to execute cyradm to add mailboxes. > > I'd like to avoid opening a shell from the web for security and > performance reasons. You don't have to open a shell.

Re: postfix, sasl2 and imapd realm problem

On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, redel wrote: > what I did: >- turned on unixheirsep to allow dots in mbox-names >- created the mailbox for each user with > cm [EMAIL PROTECTED] >- run saslpasswd2 with -u foo.com -c user > to have the domain name as realm >- used auxprop as generel p

Re: php and cyrus

ied argument is not a valid imap resource > in /var/www/html/user/mail2.php on line 55 > > Warning: imap_createmailbox(): supplied argument is not a valid imap > resource in /var/www/html/user/mail2.php on line 61 > > > > > > > > >From: Kendri

Re: php and cyrus

Here's a small attachment you can use as an include file. You can use it as such from PHP: $server = new IMAP_Server(); $server->createMailbox("user.whatever"); $server->deleteMailbox("user.whatever"); Both functions return true or false on success or failure (respectively). You can edit the fi

Re: SpamAssassin & Sieve?

On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Bill Wester wrote: > So with Cyrus, how did you get spamassassin to run? That is the problem > im having is there is not a tight well done integration between > sendmail/postfix -> spamassassin -> cyrus ->sieve -> spam happiness!!! > > any clues as to how your doing this p

Re: Postfix+Cyrus+MySQL 4th day

On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Süleyman Kuran wrote: > i dont want to erase cyrus-sasl because of too many dependencies. And if i > install sasl from source im not sure if i can put everything in the right > place to satisfy dependent software. In the spec file of cyrus-sasl-xx.rpm i > didnt find any --with

Re: Postfix+Cyrus+MySQL please help its been 3 days

You know, you might just want to have sasl authenticate directly against mysql. It'll take a layer or two off of your authentication path, ie.. imapd -> sasl -> saslauthd -> pam -> mysql, instead of simply imapd -> sasl -> mysql. Also, for a while I was following pam_mysql and it seemed a numb

Re: configure --without-krb fails, looking for Kerberos

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Ian McDonald wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cyrus-Info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 6:34 PM > Subject: Re: configure --without-krb fails, looking for Kerberos > > > > Ian, > > > > Try using "--with

Re: Sendmail + Amavisd + Cyrus 2.1.9

On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Christopher Riordan wrote: > I just rebuilt my main mail server to FreebSD 4.7 and uping Sendmail and > Cyrus to the latest. I want to add amavis and possibly spamassion into the > mix. since I'm sick of all the virus email spams I get. Has anyone set up > Amavis mainly with t

Re: cyradm binary

On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Michael Bacon wrote: > No binary's going to help you out of this error -- it's a problem in your > include path for perl. That is, if the error you're getting is still: > > Can't locate Cyrus/IMAP/Shell.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-mu

Re: Telnet commands.

On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, Frederic Trudeau wrote: > You are asking why I am not simply using cyradm. One main reason : My > client wants a web-based tool that will enable him to have control over > the mail system, and I dont know Perl. One easy way to do this via > Telnet is to use PHP and create a s

RE: how many users can Cyrus server support? -- is 5.5 msg/sec slow?

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Su Li wrote: > Hi Christian, > > I think you are right. I don't think the bottle neck is Cyrus IMAP. Because > when I move syslog to the network the performance get 2 times better and > when I change to a disk striped by 3 disks, I 2 times faster. Right now I > can get 10 ms