On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:38:43 +0200
Paul Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I suppose RH's cluster manager takes care of mounting the partitions
> and checking them if there are any errors.
Not really, at least not by itself. See
http://people.redhat.com/jrfuller/cms/ for detailed documenta
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:32:33 +0200
Paul Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, then your fscks will run faster/with less problems, but there is
> still outage that you can prevent if there is failover in another way
> and availability/replication on the application level.
> If there are repli
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 16:27:40 +0200
Paul Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
>
> > Right, works fine for us for the most part. Hasn't always been like
> > that, but the most recent kernel updates by Red Hat have improved
> > matters a lot.
>
> What did the kernel impr
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:24:42 +0200
Paul Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Although many on the list claim that this (having 2 boxes with 1
> disk-array) is a nice way for redundancy I'm in doubt now if this is
> true. It still takes 30 mins before everything is back again! It seems
> to me t
