Re: Security release for 2.4 series?

Hi Tim, Yeah, those are the correct two commits. >> My other concern was that, honestly, I'm not all that sure what the >> true risk and capability to exploit is for these bugs.  I've read the >> CVE's, and associated discussions on the a few lists - but it hasn't >> enlightened me as much as I'v

Re: strange difference between master and replica account

Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 16:16 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus: > Hi, > > another problem on another account: on the master on the file system > there is an IMAP account with about 6000 mails inside its INBOX (~ 5,8 > GB account size). Connecting with an IMAP client shows 60 mails an

Re: strange difference between master and replica account

Hi, Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 16:36 +0100 schrieb venc: > On 2015-12-14 16:16, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > another problem on another account: on the master on the file system > > there is an IMAP account with about 6000 mails inside its INBOX (~ 5,8 > > GB account si

Re: Security release for 2.4 series?

Hello all. Sorry about following up to my own email, but I think I understand the changes now to 2.4.18 in order to make it CVE compliant. As best I can understand, if I apply the two commits from Ellie Timoney on 10/26/2015, 2.4.18 would be "secure" once recompiled. These two commits appear to

strange difference between master and replica account

Hi, another problem on another account: on the master on the file system there is an IMAP account with about 6000 mails inside its INBOX (~ 5,8 GB account size). Connecting with an IMAP client shows 60 mails and an "unexpunge -l" shows 400 delete mails in the INBOX. On replica side the INBOX the

Security release for 2.4 series?

Hello all. We're trying to sort through our path here with patching for the CVE/commits that were released in 2.5.7, but also relevant to 2.4.18. We're currently on 2.4 series, and I was wondering what the plans were for a 2.4 release to address these security fixes. While moving to 2.5 is in the

Re: Trouble with Outlook 2013, especially with the upgrade from 12/8

--On 11. Dezember 2015 um 16:52:07 +0200 Leena Heino via Info-cyrus wrote: On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, André Schild via Info-cyrus wrote: Outlook and IMAP is just pain, it's not intended to work, otherwise who would buy the exchange server? 1) We see this rather seldom, but sometimes mails come i

Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 07:31 -0400 schrieb Patrick Boutilier via Info-cyrus: > On 12/14/2015 06:25 AM, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via > > Info-cyrus: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a problem with a single mailbox. The user'

Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

Hi, Am Montag, den 14.12.2015, 12:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Menge via Info-cyrus: > Hi, > > > Quoting Patrick Boutilier via Info-cyrus : > > > On 12/14/2015 06:25 AM, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: > >> Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via > >> Info-cyrus: > >

Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

Hi, Quoting Patrick Boutilier via Info-cyrus : On 12/14/2015 06:25 AM, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus: Hi, I have a problem with a single mailbox. The user's Outlook crashed and since then the sync_client is

Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

On 12/14/2015 06:25 AM, Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus wrote: Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus: Hi, I have a problem with a single mailbox. The user's Outlook crashed and since then the sync_client is running wild on this user account and produces hig

Re: Replication problem do_folders(): failed to rename

Am Freitag, den 11.12.2015, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Marcus Schopen via Info-cyrus: > Hi, > > I have a problem with a single mailbox. The user's Outlook crashed and > since then the sync_client is running wild on this user account and > produces high load on the master. I stopped sync_client on master