On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, JonL wrote:
> ok as per my last e-mail I've been able to login via telnet, but still
> no mail in the outlook client.
>
> 0 login username password
> 0 OK User logged in
> 0 select inbox
> * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen)
> * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \F
ok as per my last e-mail I've been able to login via telnet, but still no mail
in the outlook client.
0 login username password
0 OK User logged in
0 select inbox
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Draft \Deleted \Seen \*)]
* 0 EXISTS
* 0
I'm having an issue where the mail is going to the mailbox and that I can
verify, but for some reason Outlook 2003 cannot connect to the mail server
although I can ping from server to client and from client to server. Something
is stopping the connection from happening.
Since I'm fairly new to
On Jun 22, 2012, at 5:10 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> On 06/22/2012 09:43 AM, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
>>> On 06/22/2012 06:35 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 13:07 -0300, Rodrigo Abantes Antunes wrote:
> The source from horde3 is exactly the same as horde4
Tha
> On 06/22/2012 09:43 AM, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
>> On 06/22/2012 06:35 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 13:07 -0300, Rodrigo Abantes Antunes wrote:
The source from horde3 is exactly the same as horde4
>>>
>>> That is expected. It isn't the message but the interpretatio
On 06/22/2012 09:43 AM, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
> On 06/22/2012 06:35 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 13:07 -0300, Rodrigo Abantes Antunes wrote:
>>> The source from horde3 is exactly the same as horde4
>>
>> That is expected. It isn't the message but the interpretation of th
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Dan White wrote:
> On 06/19/12 19:04 -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for your continued help with this. I really appreciate it
>> and am determined to get to the end of this.
>>
>> I think I'm getting closer. I have successfully authenticated using
>>
On 06/22/2012 06:35 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 13:07 -0300, Rodrigo Abantes Antunes wrote:
>> The source from horde3 is exactly the same as horde4
>
> That is expected. It isn't the message but the interpretation of the
> message. These evil messages contain many named
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 13:07 -0300, Rodrigo Abantes Antunes wrote:
> The source from horde3 is exactly the same as horde4
That is expected. It isn't the message but the interpretation of the
message. These evil messages contain many named parts separated by a
boundry (the boundry value is declare
