Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 02:02:53PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > BTW, I love 2.4. I've been using now for several months and it is such > a HUGE improvement from 2.3. Everything is faster, replication works > better, it's like a whole new program! Just wait until you get 2.5 :) There's still lot

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:56:44PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: >> Wow, thanks! I didn't know about that command. It exposed them! >> Strange, they were in /var/spool/imap/u/DELETED/ (my mailbox root is >> /var/spool/imap). I'm not sure why t

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 05/19/2012 01:51 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: >>> I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.8. I recently had >>> an issue with a folder in a mailbox that would not show any >>> subfolders. I created a new folder 'folder2' and moved

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:56:44PM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > Wow, thanks! I didn't know about that command. It exposed them! > Strange, they were in /var/spool/imap/u/DELETED/ (my mailbox root is > /var/spool/imap). I'm not sure why they wouldn't be in > /var/spool/imap/j/user/jmaxwell (jmaxwe

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, May 19, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Stephen Ingram wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 09:51:38AM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > >> I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.8. I recently had > > > > Could be sort order bugs with 2

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Simon Matter
> On 05/19/2012 01:51 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: >> I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.8. I recently had >> an issue with a folder in a mailbox that would not show any >> subfolders. I created a new folder 'folder2' and moved all of the >> subfolders to it and then performed a recon

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Patrick Boutilier wrote: > On 05/19/2012 04:02 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Patrick Boutilier >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 05/19/2012 01:51 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Patrick Boutilier
On 05/19/2012 04:02 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Patrick Boutilier wrote: On 05/19/2012 01:51 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.8. I recently had an issue with a folder in a mailbox that would not show any subfolders.

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Patrick Boutilier wrote: > On 05/19/2012 01:51 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: >> >> I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.8. I recently had >> an issue with a folder in a mailbox that would not show any >> subfolders. I created a new folder 'folder2' and

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Stephen Ingram
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 09:51:38AM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: >> I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.8. I recently had > > Could be sort order bugs with 2.4.13 if you don't have > improved_mboxlist_sort turned on. > >> I've

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 09:51:38AM -0700, Stephen Ingram wrote: > I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.8. I recently had Could be sort order bugs with 2.4.13 if you don't have improved_mboxlist_sort turned on. > I've dumped the mailboxes.db file to a flat file to look and see if >

Re: mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Patrick Boutilier
On 05/19/2012 01:51 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.8. I recently had an issue with a folder in a mailbox that would not show any subfolders. I created a new folder 'folder2' and moved all of the subfolders to it and then performed a reconstruct on th

mailboxes.db vs IMAP client irregularities

2012-05-19 Thread Stephen Ingram
I'm running 2.4.13 from the invoca rpms on CentOS 5.8. I recently had an issue with a folder in a mailbox that would not show any subfolders. I created a new folder 'folder2' and moved all of the subfolders to it and then performed a reconstruct on the new set of folders and everything worked. Now

UNSUBSCRIBE

2012-05-19 Thread Christoph Kaminski
-- -- Greetz Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/