Re: Since updating to 2.4.10: Mailbox has an invalid format

2011-08-31 Thread Marc Muehlfeld
> imap[11591]: IOERROR: refreshing index for user.muehlfeld.IMGM_Extern.GbR: Success > imap[11591]: IOERROR: locking index user.muehlfeld.IMGM_Extern.GbR: Mailbox has an invalid format After an horrible day of many many broken mailboxes (after upgrading from 2.3.16 to 2.4.10) and as same many

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-08-31 Thread Dan White
On 31/08/11 22:40 +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote: >On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:51:03AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote: >> On 8/31/11 11:44 AM, Wesley Craig wrote: >> > On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:36, Maria McKinley wrote: >> >> Anyway, here is an example of some processes that are getting big: >> >> >> >>PID

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-08-31 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:51:03AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote: > On 8/31/11 11:44 AM, Wesley Craig wrote: > > On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:36, Maria McKinley wrote: > >> Anyway, here is an example of some processes that are getting big: > >> > >>PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIM

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-08-31 Thread John Madden
>> So annoying that the stable release of debian isn't supported >> anymore. It seems like if you wait so long to release the stable >> version that it isn't supported anymore, it sort of defeats the >> purpose. > > Debian have been staying at 2.2 rather than moving up to 2.3 through > two stable r

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-08-31 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:36:44AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote: > On 8/31/11 10:56 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > >On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:33:14AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote: > >>Hi there, > >> > >>I am having an issue with cyrus processes growing to use all of my cpus, > >>at which point I have to

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-08-31 Thread Maria McKinley
On 8/31/11 11:44 AM, Wesley Craig wrote: > On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:36, Maria McKinley wrote: >> Anyway, here is an example of some processes that are getting big: >> >>PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND >> >> 24328 cyrus 20 0 147m 6236 5004 R 27.4 0.2 22:0

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-08-31 Thread Wesley Craig
On 31 Aug 2011, at 14:36, Maria McKinley wrote: > Anyway, here is an example of some processes that are getting big: > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND > > 24328 cyrus 20 0 147m 6236 5004 R 27.4 0.2 22:07.21 imapd > > 27549 cyrus 20 0 147m

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-08-31 Thread Maria McKinley
On 8/31/11 10:56 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:33:14AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I am having an issue with cyrus processes growing to use all of my cpus, >> at which point I have to restart cyrus, because all other services on my >> mail server grind to

Re: cpu and cyrus

2011-08-31 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:33:14AM -0700, Maria McKinley wrote: > Hi there, > > I am having an issue with cyrus processes growing to use all of my cpus, > at which point I have to restart cyrus, because all other services on my > mail server grind to a halt. Below is my config file. Any ideas wh

cpu and cyrus

2011-08-31 Thread Maria McKinley
Hi there, I am having an issue with cyrus processes growing to use all of my cpus, at which point I have to restart cyrus, because all other services on my mail server grind to a halt. Below is my config file. Any ideas what may be causing this? I noticed this behavior after the last cyrus upda

Bulk deletion of mailbox ACLs under Cyrus 2.4.4

2011-08-31 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
Hi all, I'm currently trying to recursively remove all ACLs from part of a Cyrus tree so I can replace them with newer ones based upon group membership rather than individual users. However I can't seem to get this to work at the moment using a wildcard under cyradm: localhost> cm public.mcate

Re: Input on patch for ptclient/ldap requested

2011-08-31 Thread Marco
> Hi there, > > I wanted to ask who is actively using ptclient/ldap, as I have some inhouse > patch pending on the canonification using some sort of result_attribute, if > you will. We use LDAP group with Postfix and Cyrus. It should be very useful if postfix members group could match with Cyr