On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:34:24PM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:45:10AM -0400, John Madden wrote:
> > Our issues with cpu usage with very large mailbox databases (4 million
> > mailboxes) persist and I started poking at source code this morning,
> > finally having time
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:45:10AM -0400, John Madden wrote:
> Our issues with cpu usage with very large mailbox databases (4 million
> mailboxes) persist and I started poking at source code this morning,
> finally having time to look for a fix again.
>
> I originally wrote about this some time
Our issues with cpu usage with very large mailbox databases (4 million
mailboxes) persist and I started poking at source code this morning,
finally having time to look for a fix again.
I originally wrote about this some time ago:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.cyrus/32964
Again, we
Hi everybody,
I've noticed a weird behavior in a two-host setup. Consider the
following situation. I set up two hosts to act as Master and Replica.
I sent a message to Master that pushed it to Replica. I sent two more
messages to Master, and they were synced just fine too. Effectively, I
can conti
This is solved by creating self-signed CA (certificate authority) and
certificate+private key bundle. The essential detail is that when
generating the certificate you need to specify Common Name (CN) as a
fully qualified domain name (hostA.localdoman or hostA.imapsite.net,
etc.). This must be done
