Re: POLL: what should reconstruct -f do?

2011-04-22 Thread Patrick Boutilier
On 04/22/2011 08:07 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > The question came up from the following bug report: > > http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 > > Where there were spool files on disk, but no meta data left. > Reconstruct gave no information about the files on disk at > all. >

Re: POLL: what should reconstruct -f do?

2011-04-22 Thread David Lang
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote: > The question came up from the following bug report: > > http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 > > Where there were spool files on disk, but no meta data left. > Reconstruct gave no information about the files on disk at > all. > >

POLL: what should reconstruct -f do?

2011-04-22 Thread Bron Gondwana
The question came up from the following bug report: http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3449 Where there were spool files on disk, but no meta data left. Reconstruct gave no information about the files on disk at all. I see 4 options, can I'd like some opinions on what people

Re: cvt_cyrusdb before upgrade

2011-04-22 Thread Kevin Kobb
On 4/22/2011 12:05 PM, Simon Matter wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I am looking at upgrading from Cyrus 2.3.16 to 2.4.8. If I convert all >> the dbs from berkeley to skiplist before hand, is there any need to even >> build 2.4.8 with berkeley db support? (Using FreeBSD ports) >> >> I know 2.4.8 will au

Re: cvt_cyrusdb before upgrade

2011-04-22 Thread Simon Matter
> Hello All, > > I am looking at upgrading from Cyrus 2.3.16 to 2.4.8. If I convert all > the dbs from berkeley to skiplist before hand, is there any need to even > build 2.4.8 with berkeley db support? (Using FreeBSD ports) > > I know 2.4.8 will automatically update the dbs, but I figure if I did

cvt_cyrusdb before upgrade

2011-04-22 Thread Kevin Kobb
Hello All, I am looking at upgrading from Cyrus 2.3.16 to 2.4.8. If I convert all the dbs from berkeley to skiplist before hand, is there any need to even build 2.4.8 with berkeley db support? (Using FreeBSD ports) I know 2.4.8 will automatically update the dbs, but I figure if I did it before

Re: sync_client and seenptr

2011-04-22 Thread Antonio
* 22/04/2011, Rudy Gevaert wrote : > > Hi Antonia, please check the devel list :) Antonio ;-) tanx ... -- Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig. Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus

Re: sync_client and seenptr

2011-04-22 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:15:26AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote: > Hi Antonia, please check the devel list :) Yes, it's a bug - there's a pretty trivial fix for it, and it should have been in 2.4.8 but was missed somehow. Bron. Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http

Re: sync_client and seenptr

2011-04-22 Thread Rudy Gevaert
Hi Antonia, please check the devel list :) On 04/22/2011 07:08 AM, Antonio wrote: > hi all, > > sometimes the sync_client die with the message that a assert failed ... > I've seen that seen_open() in seen_db.c returns a code != 0 if > something failed, and the sync_client simply ignore and return