On 14.10.2010 7:08, Pascal Gienger wrote:
> Am 14.10.10 05:37, schrieb Frank Pittel:
>> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:33:51AM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>>> On Sat, 9 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote:
>>>
That helped but I then I ran into more troubles. I'm starting to wonder if
it'll work
>>>
Am 14.10.10 05:37, schrieb Frank Pittel:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:33:51AM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>> On Sat, 9 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote:
>>
>>> That helped but I then I ran into more troubles. I'm starting to wonder if
>>> it'll work
>>> when I do get it compiled! The errors I'm gettin
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:33:51AM -0700, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote:
>
> >That helped but I then I ran into more troubles. I'm starting to wonder if
> >it'll work
> >when I do get it compiled! The errors I'm getting now is:
> >
> >
> >gcc -L/usr/local/BerkeleyD
On 10/13/2010 4:58 PM, Oscar Mauricio Cruz Lazo wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I just backed up my mails of /var/spool/imap/user/ from one box to
> another cause im migrating the mail server, both server running suse
> 10.3, postfix, everything is great so far, except mails on the new
> mailbox. the issue he
Hi all
I just backed up my mails of /var/spool/imap/user/ from one box to another
cause im migrating the mail server, both server running suse 10.3, postfix,
everything is great so far, except mails on the new mailbox. the issue here
i not able to see each mails in theirs mailbox when i check vi
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 05:27:32PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
> With Thunderbird 3.1.3 i can subscribe only in folders located in Backend1
>
> where my account "lucas.carraro" exist.
> The other folder in backend2 are not avaiable for me:
Actually, you're subscribing fine - we're just
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:21:36PM -0300, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
> When i delete a message ( technically, move to trash ) one copy of message
> is created in mailbox Trash but the message remains on INBOX.
Ok - here's the patch that fixes this issue.
It will be in the next release, and you
My sub in backend Cyrus 2.4
user.erros^audit
user.expresso
user.lucas^carraro
user.lucas^carraro.Junk
user.lucas^carraro.Sent
user.lucas^carraro.Trash
user.sustentacao^unix
user.sustentacao^unix.Junk
user.sustentacao^unix.Sent
user.sustentacao^unix.Trash
Folders :
user.lucas^carraro
user.lucas
Are you reconstructing with -G? My best guess is the original file is corrupt,
but without -G it won't notice!
steff...@gmx.de wrote:
>Hello everybody,
>
>I have a problem regarding the synchronisation in 2.4.0. I installed 2.4.0 on
>two test servers where 2.3.16 was installed. The imapd on the
> Simon Matter wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
>> >> I'm happy to see this.
>> >>
>> >> Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
>> >>
>> >> David Lang
>> >
>> > We're planning to reach out to the distributions and convince them
>> > to
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote:
; Thanks for your build script. I'll give it a try when I get home. Some of the
lacations
; of things like sasl and burkley db are in different locations but that
shouldn't be
; an issue. I forgot to mention that I'm running sol-10 on x86.
btw, now that
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 09:04:45AM +, Andy Fiddaman wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote:
> ; > >
> ; > > Any chance of getting a package for solaris 10? I've been trying to
> build 2.3.16 for over
> ; > > a week and still haven't gotten it to compile.
> ; >
> ; > I really do
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 06:38:27AM -0500, Patrick Goetz wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 8:49 PM, Wesley Craig wrote:
> >
> > \Noselect is the result of LIST et al not finding the mailbox in question.
> > It's not "set" per se, but returned descriptively. Given the odd sort order
> > from ctl_mboxlist -d,
Hello everybody,
I have a problem regarding the synchronisation in 2.4.0. I installed 2.4.0 on
two test servers where 2.3.16 was installed. The imapd on the replica hasn't
been running for a while. After the two where online I tried to replicate from
the master to the replica and ran into some
On 10/12/2010 5:48 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>
> man imapd.conf on my machine gets:
>
> improved_mboxlist_sort: 0
> If enabled, a special comparator will be used which will correctly
> sort mailbox names that contain characters such as ' ' and '-'.
>
> Note that this opti
On 10/12/2010 8:49 PM, Wesley Craig wrote:
>
> \Noselect is the result of LIST et al not finding the mailbox in question.
> It's not "set" per se, but returned descriptively. Given the odd sort order
> from ctl_mboxlist -d, incompatible sort order is why LIST can't see it.
>
Wes, Bron, thanks fo
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Frank Pittel wrote:
; > >
; > > Any chance of getting a package for solaris 10? I've been trying to build
2.3.16 for over
; > > a week and still haven't gotten it to compile.
; >
; > I really don't know much about Solaris 10 packaging. I do have a Solaris
; > box though...
Simon Matter wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:23:18PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
> >> I'm happy to see this.
> >>
> >> Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
> >>
> >> David Lang
> >
> > We're planning to reach out to the distributions and convince them
> > to package
Hi,
i have a problem, with the replication of a usermailbox.
The syncserver logs
Oct 13 08:54:05 syncserver[17564]: accepted connection
Oct 13 08:54:05 syncserver[17569]: executed
Oct 13 08:54:05 syncserver[17564]: cmdloop(): startup
Oct 13 08:54:05 syncserver[17564]: login:
19 matches
Mail list logo
