> Hello
>
> I have a strange issue. My setup is FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 and the newest
> Cyrus Imapd (.15).:
> In the maillog from sendmail I see that the mail will transfered to
> Cyrus but it never arrived in the addressed mailbox (of course I tried
> different addresses...). I find out that, if I re-
Hello
I have a strange issue. My setup is FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 and the newest
Cyrus Imapd (.15).:
In the maillog from sendmail I see that the mail will transfered to
Cyrus but it never arrived in the addressed mailbox (of course I tried
different addresses...). I find out that, if I re-send a specif
Looking through the archives it looks like Bron produced a patch that
puts this abort in to prevent corruption (yay) and instead print aborts,
but I now have a situation where things appear to be hung and I'm trying
to find out why and what I should do to fix it.
(This all happened while batch-
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 08:58 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 08:18 +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> > To me using offlineimap to sync my mailbox I much faster than doing
> > IMAP over slow links. It also gives me a backup of my mailbox very
> > easily.
>
> I'm thinking ab
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 08:18 +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Citeren David Lang :
> > what do you consider a 'modern IMAP client' that is actually reasonably
> > efficiant to use?
> I can't help you answer that question. But I can share my setup.
I use Evolution on my laptop, I don't know if it is "
Citeren Bron Gondwana :
> You might want this patch:
>
> http://github.com/brong/brong-offlineimap/commit/7846ab83c5c45911749ab1cb42569702363a619b
>
> You'll need a pretty current Cyrus of course, but then you get
> COMPRESS=DEFLATE support built in to offlineimap. I find about
> 80% bandwidth
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 08:18:17AM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
>
> Citeren David Lang :
>
> > what do you consider a 'modern IMAP client' that is actually reasonably
> > efficiant to use?
>
> I can't help you answer that question. But I can share my setup.
>
> I'm using the offlineimap client s
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:15:08AM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> Too bad, so sad. Seriously. If you really want to use e-mail address
> at some antique domain where IMAP access is still not available, and
> where e-mail forwarding is also not available, then you can still just
> set up your MUA s
Citeren David Lang :
> what do you consider a 'modern IMAP client' that is actually reasonably
> efficiant to use?
I can't help you answer that question. But I can share my setup.
I'm using the offlineimap client so sync my IMAP (Cyrus of course)
accounts (2 in fact).
I then use mutt to rea