Re: Implement Cyrus IMAPD in High Load Enviromment

2009-09-28 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 03:33:44PM -0700, Vincent Fox wrote: > Bron Gondwana wrote: > >I assume you mean 500 gigs! We're switching from 300 to 500 on new > >filesystems because we have one business customer that's over > >150Gb now and we want to keep all their users on the one partition > >for >

Re: Implement Cyrus IMAPD in High Load Enviromment

2009-09-28 Thread Vincent Fox
Bron Gondwana wrote: I assume you mean 500 gigs! We're switching from 300 to 500 on new filesystems because we have one business customer that's over 150Gb now and we want to keep all their users on the one partition for folder sharing. We don't do any murder though. Oops yes. I meant 5

Re: Implement Cyrus IMAPD in High Load Enviromment

2009-09-28 Thread Bron Gondwana
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:59:43AM -0700, Vincent Fox wrote: > Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote: > > > >- Exist a recommended size to a Backend server ( Ex: 1 Tb )? > > > Hardware-wise your setup is probably overkill. > Nothing wrong with that. Yeah, that's a fair few machines! Nice to have space for i

Re: Implement Cyrus IMAPD in High Load Enviromment

2009-09-28 Thread Ciro Iriarte
2009/9/28 Lucas Zinato Carraro : > Hi, I am deploing cyrus-imapd in my organization: > > My organization need to have: > >  - 75000  maiboxes >  - 1 simultaneous connections (IMAP) >  - 3000 mailboxes with 1Gb and 65000 with 200Mb >  - 12 Tb for spool ( EMC Clarion Storage ) >  - 15 servers wit

Re: Implement Cyrus IMAPD in High Load Enviromment

2009-09-28 Thread Vincent Fox
Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote: - Exist a recommended size to a Backend server ( Ex: 1 Tb )? Hardware-wise your setup is probably overkill. Nothing wrong with that. Sizing of filesystems IMO should be based on your tolerance for long fsck during a disaster. I run ZFS which has none of that and d

Implement Cyrus IMAPD in High Load Enviromment

2009-09-28 Thread Lucas Zinato Carraro
Hi, I am deploing cyrus-imapd in my organization: My organization need to have: - 75000 maiboxes - 1 simultaneous connections (IMAP) - 3000 mailboxes with 1Gb and 65000 with 200Mb - 12 Tb for spool ( EMC Clarion Storage ) - 15 servers with Xeon 2.6ghz - 8gb RAM - GNU/Linux 2.6 for Oper

Re: reconstruct problem

2009-09-28 Thread Luca Tolomelli
I've just found the problem: NTFS removes the "." (dot) character at the end of the file names. All the mail file names have a number follower by a "." (dot)...! On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 01:01, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 05:56:00PM +0200, Luca Tolomelli wrote: >> I have this pr