Re: POP3 locking. Is there a way to reduce this "issue"?

2009-05-18 Thread Vincent Fox
Jose Perez wrote: > Some people could just say "don't use POP3 anymore, use IMAP" right? > YES! > Ok, I'd say the same as a sysadmin but you know exactly that this > isn't always possible is some organizations for others reasons not > technical. > > What I would like to know is: > > Are there

POP3 locking. Is there a way to reduce this "issue"?

2009-05-18 Thread Jose Perez
Hi there: I'm having problems with POP3 locking. I already read the forums and info-cyrus mail archives talking about this but I didn't find a solution yet: - RFC states that is it necessary a minimum of 10 minutes before detect a timeout on the client - RFC states that only one connection is pos

Re: packages for debian amd64

2009-05-18 Thread Duncan Gibb
Carlos Horowicz wrote: CH> is there anybody maintaining up-to-date amd64 debian packages CH> for cyrus-imapd ? (I only use FreeBSD ports por cyrus-imap, CH> don't know if there are "port maintainers" in the CH> Debian/Ubuntu world). Yes, kind of. There are no 2.3.x binaries in official Debian (y

packages for debian amd64

2009-05-18 Thread Carlos Horowicz
Hi, is there anybody maintaining up-to-date amd64 debian packages for cyrus-imapd ? (I only use FreeBSD ports por cyrus-imap, don't know if there are "port maintainers" in the Debian/Ubuntu world). Thanks, Carlos Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap

Re: imapd locked

2009-05-18 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On 18. Mai 2009 08:41:42 -0400 Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Depends on what you mean. New connections to imapd block block indefinitely until the number of processes goes below maxchild. If that's what you call "stall", it's to be expected. If connections are forced into a wait-state by a

Re: imapd locked

2009-05-18 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
> > It might well be that I hit the maxchild limit on imap, but that shouldnt > > stall the complete imap, should it? > Depends on what you mean. New connections to imapd block block indefinitely > until the number of processes goes below maxchild. If that's what you call > "stall", it's to be ex

Re: Incorrect sort order when sorting by date

2009-05-18 Thread Andy Bennett
Hi, > I bet if you look at the Date headers of the problem emails, you'll find > that they're not RFC compliant. > > The cyrus date parser is very strict, and if the header isn't RFC > compliant, you'll get a bad value, and bad sorting. > > Looking at the RFC > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc525

Re: Incorrect sort order when sorting by date

2009-05-18 Thread Gavan Fantom
Robert Mueller (web) wrote: > I bet if you look at the Date headers of the problem emails, you'll find > that they're not RFC compliant. These are the date headers from the offending emails. Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 01:48:19 -0700 Date: Sun 17 Feb 2008 20:05:01 -0500 Date: Sun 27 Jan 2008 20:15:18

Re: imapd locked

2009-05-18 Thread Gerald Nowitzky
Hello Sebastian, What I wanted to describe with "stalled" is, that none of the processes was doing anything. So the problem was not that 100 instances where working and connection #101 was waiting; it was that all 100 instances were also hanging. At the same time, the imaps-processes where wor

Re: imapd locked

2009-05-18 Thread Janne Peltonen
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 02:12:55PM +0200, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: >> imapcmd="imapd -U 50" listen="imap" prefork=0 >> maxchild=100 >> imaps cmd="imapd -s -U 50" listen="imaps" prefork=0 >> maxchild=100 >> >> [...] > Depends on what you mean. New connections t

Re: Incorrect sort order when sorting by date

2009-05-18 Thread Robert Mueller (web)
I bet if you look at the Date headers of the problem emails, you'll find that they're not RFC compliant. The cyrus date parser is very strict, and if the header isn't RFC compliant, you'll get a bad value, and bad sorting. Looking at the RFC http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc5256.html If the sent

another strange pop protocol

2009-05-18 Thread Stefan Palme
Hello, We are running Cyrus IMAP Server 2.3.13 to store user mails. One of our customers uses MS Exchange to fetch the mails from our server to their MS Exchange system (from where the mails are distributed to the correct users in the customers intranet). Because customer complaints about times w

Re: imapd locked

2009-05-18 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
--On 18. Mai 2009 14:00:33 +0200 Gerald Nowitzky wrote: I had a strange problem with my cyrus here. I am starting imapd with imapcmd="imapd -U 50" listen="imap" prefork=0 maxchild=100 imaps cmd="imapd -s -U 50" listen="imaps" prefork=0 maxchild=100 Three

imapd locked

2009-05-18 Thread Gerald Nowitzky
Hello! I had a strange problem with my cyrus here. I am starting imapd with imapcmd="imapd -U 50" listen="imap" prefork=0 maxchild=100 imaps cmd="imapd -s -U 50" listen="imaps" prefork=0 maxchild=100 Three times this morning I found that imap was stalled.

Re: Incorrect sort order when sorting by date

2009-05-18 Thread Andy Bennett
Hi, > I am running cyrus imapd 2.2.13 on NetBSD, as installed from pkgsrc. I've also got a cyrus + roundcube installation and I see the same problem. I've got cyrus 2.2.13-10 on Debian etch. The out of order messages in my INBOX just happen to be spam and some have weird character sets. The d

Incorrect sort order when sorting by date

2009-05-18 Thread Gavan Fantom
I have been running cyrus imapd for several years now. I recently installed roundcube, to provide access to email on those occasions when a proper IMAP client isn't available. Unlike Thunderbird, roundcube relies on IMAP SORT. When sorting by date, some emails from the past are presented as new