Re: strange pop protocol? [solved]

2009-04-30 Thread Stefan Palme
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 20:48 +0200, kleine...@gmx.net wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 14:15 -0400, Wesley Craig wrote: > > On 30 Apr 2009, at 13:10, Stefan Palme wrote: > > > No, the pop server does not hang. After this "QUIT" message the client > > > disappears. The next connection from the same cli

Re: strange pop protocol?

2009-04-30 Thread kleine...@gmx.net
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 14:15 -0400, Wesley Craig wrote: > On 30 Apr 2009, at 13:10, Stefan Palme wrote: > > No, the pop server does not hang. After this "QUIT" message the client > > disappears. The next connection from the same client (or from any > > other > > client) works normally - client can

Re: strange pop protocol?

2009-04-30 Thread Wesley Craig
On 30 Apr 2009, at 13:10, Stefan Palme wrote: > No, the pop server does not hang. After this "QUIT" message the client > disappears. The next connection from the same client (or from any > other > client) works normally - client can fetch at least one email. Have you enabled cyrus telemetry for

Re: strange pop protocol?

2009-04-30 Thread Stefan Palme
On Thu, April 30, 2009 17:40, Wesley Craig wrote: > On 30 Apr 2009, at 03:08, Stefan Palme wrote: >> As far as I understood, a POP3 server must ALWAYS send a response (+OK or -ERR). But in my case the server does not response at all. >> >> Any hints why/how this can happen? I see this behaviour ver

Re: strange pop protocol?

2009-04-30 Thread Wesley Craig
On 30 Apr 2009, at 03:08, Stefan Palme wrote: > As far as I understood, a POP3 server must ALWAYS send a response > (+OK or -ERR). But in my case the server does not response at all. > > Any hints why/how this can happen? I see this behaviour very > often on the wire. Maybe it is worth mentioning t

Re: Bug? xfermailbox seems to be broken but using rename to xfer a mailbox works just fine.

2009-04-30 Thread Wesley Craig
On 30 Apr 2009, at 11:05, Brian Awood wrote: > It looks like error was logged from your frontend host m2v1t, so I > would guess that the xfer command was issued to it, which isn't > correct. You have to connect to the backend where the mailbox is > stored and give the xfer command there. But the

Re: Bug? xfermailbox seems to be broken but using rename to xfer a mailbox works just fine.

2009-04-30 Thread Brian Awood
On Thursday 30 April 2009 @ 03:55, Janne Peltonen wrote: > Hi! > > Am I doing something wrong? If I try to do an xfer from one backend > to another on a user, like so, > > xfer user.atest001r m2v3t.mappi.helsinki.fi > > I get > > Apr 30 10:24:45 m2cn1t m2v1t/imap[3793]: could not dump mailbox in

Re : unixhierarchysep: yes/no doesn't work as expected

2009-04-30 Thread mami bond
Thanks for the reply, I tried first using "#unixhierarchysep: no" and no mailbox was created in Cyrus "cyradm -u cyrus localhost" totally empty and also empty in the folder "/var/spool/cyrus/mail/letter/user/username". That's why I changed to YES -> "unixhierarchysep: yes" and it works with the

Bug? xfermailbox seems to be broken but using rename to xfer a mailbox works just fine.

2009-04-30 Thread Janne Peltonen
Hi! Am I doing something wrong? If I try to do an xfer from one backend to another on a user, like so, xfer user.atest001r m2v3t.mappi.helsinki.fi I get Apr 30 10:24:45 m2cn1t m2v1t/imap[3793]: could not dump mailbox in m2v2t.mappi.helsinki.fi (unknown error) Apr 30 10:24:45 m2cn1t m2v1t/ima

Re: strange pop protocol?

2009-04-30 Thread Stefan Palme
I've just took a look on the exact POP-3 spec. There seems to be another problem: > > +OK <98640940.1241005...@imap.example.com> imap.example.com Cyrus POP3 > v2.3.13-Gentoo server ready > USER username > +OK Name is a valid mailbox > PASS pas