Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> A friend of mine is asking me about security risks of using IMAP &
>> POP3 protocols. Why? Because a sales person told my friend that IMAP
>> protocol is less secure than POP3 protocol.
This reminds me of a concern that was raised about U Wash IMAP and storage
of
> A friend of mine is asking me about security risks of using IMAP &
> POP3 protocols. Why? Because a sales person told my friend that IMAP
> protocol is less secure than POP3 protocol. This assumption is not
> related to Cyrus IMAP, instead is related only to the protocols.
> I'm searching at Goog
On Feb 12, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
Hi people:
A friend of mine is asking me about security risks of using IMAP &
POP3 protocols. Why? Because a sales person told my friend that IMAP
protocol is less secure than POP3 protocol. This assumption is not
related to Cyrus IMAP, instea
Hi people:
A friend of mine is asking me about security risks of using IMAP &
POP3 protocols. Why? Because a sales person told my friend that IMAP
protocol is less secure than POP3 protocol. This assumption is not
related to Cyrus IMAP, instead is related only to the protocols.
I'm searching at Go
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:45:58AM -0600, Josh Whitver wrote:
> It's actually possible we are using BDB - earlier in the mail server's
> life we moved it from a PowerPC G5 Xserve to the Intel Xserve, and we
> needed to work around the endian issues inherent in some part of the
> mail server,
It's actually possible we are using BDB - earlier in the mail server's
life we moved it from a PowerPC G5 Xserve to the Intel Xserve, and we
needed to work around the endian issues inherent in some part of the
mail server, so I recall converting a database in some direction,
either from BDB
