On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Scott M. Likens wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> If you want ZFS you have several choices, OS X (Leopard), as there is a
> development version that supports RAID-Z and works quite well. You
> can't boot off of it, but that will change in Snow Leopard.
>
> Additionally you can use Opens
Hi David,
If you want ZFS you have several choices, OS X (Leopard), as there is a
development version that supports RAID-Z and works quite well. You
can't boot off of it, but that will change in Snow Leopard.
Additionally you can use Opensolaris such as Nexenta, or you can use
fuse to get ZFS
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Scott M. Likens wrote:
> With ZFS your leaving a "ton" of stone-age worries behind. You can go
> much beyond inodes in the perks of ZFS.
and gaining some new worries along the way. while some are convinced that ZFS
is
the best thing ever others see it as trading a set of k
...
I debated writing a gui for Cyrus for administration, but I realized
that people implement Cyrus in so many different ways. Kerberos, LDAP,
*SQL, various forms of PAM. Then you add in virtual domains, and how
you might want alias's and might not, and different MTA support... and I
just c
With ZFS your leaving a "ton" of stone-age worries behind. You can go
much beyond inodes in the perks of ZFS.
Vincent Fox wrote:
> Wesley Craig wrote:
>
>>> Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
>>> disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.),
>>>
> With ZFS, inodes are
Do Duc Huy wrote:
> Hi,
> I am in a same situation with you about system components. I have used
> postfix+cyrus+ldap for email system since 2001 and system performance is
> still good now. But I have to face with two problems with this system. The
> first one is GUI for user and administrator.
Th
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
> On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
>> Why does cyrus need it's own
>> structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
>> compatible, to maildir. Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
>> disadvantages (huge needs in terms
Wesley Craig wrote:
>> Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
>> disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.),
With ZFS, inodes are among the many stone-age worries you leave behind.
;-)
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
> Why does cyrus need it's own
> structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
> compatible, to maildir. Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
> disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc.), yet I see no
> distinctive adv
Jens wrote:
> Adam D schrieb:
>
>> Adam D wrote:
>>
>>> I have noticed this error in the log:
>>> Sep 12 18:57:44 vts-post cyrus/imap[19629]: IOERROR: locking
>>> /var/lib/cyrus/domain/W/domain1/user/A/userbox.sub: Interrupted system call
>>>
>>> Soon afterwards I notice imapd runs at 99.8
Hello,
2008/9/17 Simon Matter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Another thing which really intrigued me was the inherent
>> cluster-ability of dovecot, which is a huge PITA to get to run on
>> cyrus (as I have just implemented it a couple of months ago). Yet I
>> only have read about it in the documentation
> Another thing which really intrigued me was the inherent
> cluster-ability of dovecot, which is a huge PITA to get to run on
> cyrus (as I have just implemented it a couple of months ago). Yet I
> only have read about it in the documentation, and not actually seen it
> in action. But at least the
Heya :)
2008/9/17 Adam Tauno Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> I noticed that dovecot and cyrus don't differ that much in speed to
>> each other. Both seem to excel at certain points, while being weaker
>> at another. But overall the performance on a huge mailbox seemed to be
>> comparable. Doveco
> I noticed that dovecot and cyrus don't differ that much in speed to
> each other. Both seem to excel at certain points, while being weaker
> at another. But overall the performance on a huge mailbox seemed to be
> comparable. Dovecot seemed to be slightly better at searching in the
> mailbox, esp
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Do Duc Huy wrote:
> My question is about my second problem. It 's about antispam and antivirus.
> I have used amavis for spam and virus filter. This can block virus very well
> but it have no effect in blocking spam mail, I think.
Get the newest version of amavisd-new, and rea
Hi all,
I know I will take some heat for this (as I know this is a cyrus
mailinglist), but I'm going to offer some points for dovecot. I'm all
for informed decisions, where one can weigh points against each other
and decide on that basis.
First of all, I have administrated both courier and cyrus
Hi,
I am in a same situation with you about system components. I have used
postfix+cyrus+ldap for email system since 2001 and system performance is
still good now. But I have to face with two problems with this system. The
first one is GUI for user and administrator. Squirrelmail was helpful enough
Hi.
I wonder what the stage dir is...
My stagedir is 21GB, those 21GB could i use somewhere else.
mail2# du -sh /imap/stage./
21G/imap/stage./
mail2#
Can i delete everything in this directory?
/Casper
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusima
Adam D schrieb:
> Adam D wrote:
>> I have noticed this error in the log:
>> Sep 12 18:57:44 vts-post cyrus/imap[19629]: IOERROR: locking
>> /var/lib/cyrus/domain/W/domain1/user/A/userbox.sub: Interrupted system call
>>
>> Soon afterwards I notice imapd runs at 99.8 % and I can not kill the
>> proce
Hello List,
The best tool to manage the cyrus is web-cyradm I think.
Is there any way to configure web-cyradm with openldap ?
Has any one done it by any chance ?
Kindly suggest.
--
~~
Joydeep Bakshi, Linux System Admin
Kolkatainfoservices Pvt Ltd,
23A Royd
Adam D wrote:
> I have noticed this error in the log:
> Sep 12 18:57:44 vts-post cyrus/imap[19629]: IOERROR: locking
> /var/lib/cyrus/domain/W/domain1/user/A/userbox.sub: Interrupted system call
>
> Soon afterwards I notice imapd runs at 99.8 % and I can not kill the
> process. It looks like the f
21 matches
Mail list logo
