Re: Cyrus infrastructure performance less than expected

2008-04-28 Thread Eric Déchaux
Alain Spineux a écrit : > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Eric Déchaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> >> I have juste setup a Cyrus infrastructure based on VMware Virtual >> Infrastructure 3.0.1 and I have a huge performance problem. >> >> The new infrastructure was sized f

Re: Cyrus infrastructure performance less than expected

2008-04-28 Thread Eric Déchaux
Robert Banz a écrit : >> I don't have any system log that complains about something and the >> only >> Cyrus message I got is a DB4 warning about lockers. I think the DB4 in >> question is the TLS sessions cache DB and in my case the number of >> lockers can be as high as 8 000... > > Dump Berkel

Re: Cyrus infrastructure performance less than expected

2008-04-28 Thread Pascal Gienger
Eric Déchaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The older infrastructure can stand the 42 000 concurrent sessions, the > new one can't : I was expecting each frontend to be able to handle 5 500 > concurrent sessions but they are not. Around 3 000 / 3 500 concurrent > sessions the frontends begin to SWAP

Re: Cyrus infrastructure performance less than expected

2008-04-28 Thread Alain Spineux
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Eric Déchaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear all, > > > I have juste setup a Cyrus infrastructure based on VMware Virtual > Infrastructure 3.0.1 and I have a huge performance problem. > > The new infrastructure was sized for 120 000 mailboxes with 42 000 > ma

Re: Cyrus infrastructure performance less than expected

2008-04-28 Thread Robert Banz
> > I don't have any system log that complains about something and the > only > Cyrus message I got is a DB4 warning about lockers. I think the DB4 in > question is the TLS sessions cache DB and in my case the number of > lockers can be as high as 8 000... Dump Berkeley DB with a quickness, and

Cyrus infrastructure performance less than expected

2008-04-28 Thread Eric Déchaux
Dear all, I have juste setup a Cyrus infrastructure based on VMware Virtual Infrastructure 3.0.1 and I have a huge performance problem. The new infrastructure was sized for 120 000 mailboxes with 42 000 maximum concurrent IMAPS sessions (neither POP3 nor IMAP available). The important point i

Re: Account re-initialization after directory deletion

2008-04-28 Thread Scott Likens
Hi, Easiest fix is to re-create the directory of the account that was deleted, with the cyrus.* files in it. Easiest thing if you can find an empty account on your server. cp -pr it to your account name, ensure the permissions are the same (owner cyrus) then you can reconstruct -r -f user.

Re: Account re-initialization after directory deletion

2008-04-28 Thread Alain Spineux
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Thomas Manson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've an issue with my account. > > the directory of the account in /var/spool/imap/t/user was deleted. > > When I try to gets its mail, I get : "Unable to open maildrop : System I/O > error" > (Apr 27 20:33:06