Hello Bron
2008/3/5, Bron Gondwana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> OOps, I thought I had replied...
... no worry.
> > > Sorry about the delay in replying. That just looks like debugging info.
> > > We don't get it, so I wonder if you have a debugging level turned on
> > > that we don't.
> >
>
> but all attempts to simulate
> a client load-pattern are devilishly difficult to get right.
I can atest to this as well.
I created an "imapstresstest" tool a few years back to attempt to stress our
cyrus installs. It attempts to emulate all the main actions of a running
IMAP server like lots
Jeff Fookson wrote:
> We are planning to run the mirrors
> off a 4-port 3ware RAID card even though we're not overly fond of
> 3ware (we have a fair amount of experience
> with RAID5 arrays on 3ware cards on our research machines where they
> perform adequately but
> not more). We are hoping the
Vincent Fox wrote:
>David Lang wrote:
>
>
>>raid 6 allows you to loose any two disks and keep going.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>This is turning into a RAID discussion.
>
>The orginal poster was doing a RAID-5 across 3 disks, and has stopped
>commenting but it's probably because that's all the hardware
David Lang wrote:
>
> raid 6 allows you to loose any two disks and keep going.
>
>
This is turning into a RAID discussion.
The orginal poster was doing a RAID-5 across 3 disks, and has stopped
commenting but it's probably because that's all the hardware he could
scrounge.
I am a staunch memb
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Ian G Batten wrote:
> On 05 Mar 08, at 1549, Simon Matter wrote:
>
>>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Ian G Batten wrote:
>>>
software RAID5 is a performance
disaster area at the best of times unless it can take advantage of
intimate knowledge of the intent log in the file
I try to use quota on INBOX user but not on trash but I have strange
behavior :
cm user.testing
sam user.testing testing all
sq user.testing 30
cm user.testing.Trash
sq user.testing.Trash none
cm user.testing.other
If I have mail in user.testing.other folder (none in INBOX) and if I
make qu
At 21.38 04/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know if this will
work with cyrus to create some kind of cyrus cluster? or at least a
failover?
http://www.drbd.org/
Yes, we are using drdb as a failover cluster for a couple of RRH4 servers
(web & mail) using two different partitions. E
On 05 Mar 08, at 1549, Simon Matter wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Ian G Batten wrote:
>>
>>> software RAID5 is a performance
>>> disaster area at the best of times unless it can take advantage of
>>> intimate knowledge of the intent log in the filesystem (RAID-Z does
>>> this),
>>
>> actually, un
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, Ian G Batten wrote:
>
>> software RAID5 is a performance
>> disaster area at the best of times unless it can take advantage of
>> intimate knowledge of the intent log in the filesystem (RAID-Z does
>> this),
>
> actually, unless you have top-notch hardware raid controllers, s
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 07:01:13 +0100, "Martin Schweizer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> ( Sorry,again but I did not get an answer until now)
OOps, I thought I had replied...
> > Sorry about the delay in replying. That just looks like debugging info.
> > We don't get it, so I wonder if you have a d
Hi everybody.
I have some problems with cyr_expire.
Everytime i try to run it (mostlt from cyrus.conf) i get a bus error.
So it means my disk is filling up quickly.
I run 2.3.11, but i have downgraded and tried all versions from 2.3.7 and
i get the same error.
Here is my output,
mail2# su cy
12 matches
Mail list logo
