On Jan 8, 2007, at 21:08, Rob Mueller wrote:
We are using 2.3.7 on Debian Sarge.
We will maybe move to solaris because of the features of ZFS.
Does anyone know the status of ZFS + fsync performance problems?
http://www.irbs.net/internet/info-cyrus/0610/0058.html
Supposedly fixed in Solaris
Jeff and I have already discussed pushing out a 2.3 release soon -- as
soon as we iron out all of the wrinkles in our 2.3 deployment on campus.
We found a few small buglets in the IMAP proxy code that we didn't
expect. Either nobody else has a 2.3 Murder running, or they didn't
notice the random
We are using 2.3.7 on Debian Sarge.
We will maybe move to solaris because of the features of ZFS.
Does anyone know the status of ZFS + fsync performance problems?
http://www.irbs.net/internet/info-cyrus/0610/0058.html
Rob
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: ht
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:23:50 -0500, "Ken Murchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Bron Gondwana wrote:
> > It's been a while since I posted our list of patches, and there have been
> > a couple of changes since then.
> >
> > I'm generating the site from a script and a bunch of patch description fil
On 08 Jan 2007, at 11:23, Ken Murchison wrote:
We found a few small buglets in the IMAP proxy code that we didn't
expect. Either nobody else has a 2.3 Murder running, or they
didn't notice the random (infrequent) core dumps.
We're (UMich) continuing to run 2.3 replicated backends with 2.2
Farzad FARID wrote:
king coredump.
I too wonder who runs Cyrus IMAP 2.3 Murder, because hardly anybody ever
answers my questions here and I have to reply to myself ;)
Our site is planning to migrate to the Murder setup. But I haven't
gotten to it yet. Currently we have about 41955 accounts
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Farzad FARID wrote:
Hi,
on 08.01.2007 17:23 Ken Murchison said the following:
Jeff and I have already discussed pushing out a 2.3 release soon -- as
soon as we iron out all of the wrinkles in our 2.3 deployment on campus.
We found a few small buglets in the IMAP proxy cod
Hello,
First of all a couple of questions:
1) Are you planning to manage multiple domainsÂ’ mail, or just the
domain.com mail?
2) Can you post the contents of the canonical.cf file that postfix
uses for canonical mapping?
3) Why would you want SASL to talk to PAM for PAM to
Hi,
on 08.01.2007 17:23 Ken Murchison said the following:
>
> Jeff and I have already discussed pushing out a 2.3 release soon -- as
> soon as we iron out all of the wrinkles in our 2.3 deployment on campus.
>
> We found a few small buglets in the IMAP proxy code that we didn't
> expect. Either n
Ben Poliakoff wrote:
* Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070108 08:34]:
Jeff and I have already discussed pushing out a 2.3 release soon -- as
soon as we iron out all of the wrinkles in our 2.3 deployment on campus.
We found a few small buglets in the IMAP proxy code that we didn
* Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070108 08:34]:
>
> Jeff and I have already discussed pushing out a 2.3 release soon -- as
> soon as we iron out all of the wrinkles in our 2.3 deployment on campus.
>
> We found a few small buglets in the IMAP proxy code that we didn
Simon Matter wrote:
It's been a while since I posted our list of patches, and there have been
a couple of changes since then.
I'm generating the site from a script and a bunch of patch description
files
now, so I should be able to keep it up to date.
Feel free to use any of these patches, and
Hello,
I'm sorry, but this statement parses as nonsense. You have saslauthd
running but it isn't used, and you have auxprop listed even though you
don't have an auxprop. How exactly are you being authenticated?
there seems to be a default auxprop, because saslauthd was configured to
use pa
Bron Gondwana wrote:
It's been a while since I posted our list of patches, and there have been
a couple of changes since then.
I'm generating the site from a script and a bunch of patch description files
now, so I should be able to keep it up to date.
Feel free to use any of these patches, and
no cyrus is using hte same berkeley DB.
I jsut plugged a new disk and the raid sarted reconstruction.
In this situation started the problem with mailboxes.db
the /var/imap/db directory does exist.
but there si also another problem
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCP
John Thomas wrote:
> I am still curios if Postfix has accepted the message prior to or after
> the execution of the sieve script.
On my system at least, the sieve scripts are executed once messages have
been accepted by postfix and passed to cyrus for delivery.
I need to look into it further, but
Hello,
I am updating the mail server at my work and in this process I decided to
change the Courier-IMAP for the Cyrus-IMAP, however I still came across
myself with a problem without solution (at least for me). Here, all users
have an personal ID who is used to effect the authentication in some s
17 matches
Mail list logo
