Re: How to move mail from /var/mail into imap

Hello Caleb, I use formail for that purpose: cat /var/mail/username | \ formail -b -f -s /usr/local/cyrus/bin/deliver -a username username (Only Return-Path gets lost this way, but this probably doesn't matter.) formail is part of the procmail package. Look at "man formail" to check if you n

Re: Too slow

--On April 7, 2006 8:58:57 PM +0200 Sascha Bieler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there, I am running cyrus-imapd-2.1.12 on a Gentoo Linux with kernel 2.6.15. Got a Pentium 4 Xeon 2,8 GHz and 2 GB Ram. The cyruspartition is ext3 on a SCSI RAID 5. hdparm -tT /dev/sda says: /dev/sda: Timi

Re: Too slow

I personally prefer xfs over reiserfs, however I don't think it's better, because each file-system has it's give and take. No matter which 'guide' you may find they should tell you the cost and benefit of every file-system. On Sat, 8 Apr 2006 00:52:51 +0200 "Sascha Bieler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: How to move mail from /var/mail into imap

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Caleb Walker wrote: Caleb Walker wrote: My server uses procmail to process mail through spamassassin and then into the users mailbox. In Debian I have found that for deliver (cyrdeliver) to work I have to set the sticky bit. I did an update recently and it removed the sti

Re: How to move mail from /var/mail into imap

On Friday 07 April 2006 09:20, Caleb Walker wrote: > I have asked a handful of questions and most, if not all of the time, I > do not get a response.  Is it because I ask in a rude way?  Do I not > provide enough info?  Are my questions about things that are impossible > or too difficult? More tha

Re: How to move mail from /var/mail into imap

Caleb Walker wrote: >My server uses procmail to process mail through spamassassin and then >into the users mailbox. In Debian I have found that for deliver >(cyrdeliver) to work I have to set the sticky bit. I did an update >recently and it removed the sticky bit on cyrdeliver and therefore mail

Re: Virtual domains and [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jim Norton wrote: Quoting Ciprian Vizitiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: It doesn't seem like Cyrus related but a MTA one. Anyway the question is (I think): do you have ONE Joe with ONE IMAP box and he should be able to receive mail on TWO domains? Or what you really have is TWO Joe(s) in TWO differ

RE: Too slow

Yes, indeed. That's why I bought an RAID5 Controller and do a backup every night. I have an extra partition for var, so I just have to copy all, boot from disc, format and recopy... That's simple too, but unfortunatly I got no more power today to do this... ;-) Have a good night and nice weekend

Re: Too slow

So buy a new drive, format it with reiser or xfs or whatever and do some tests of your own. I know from personal experience after running it with xfs, it was alot faster then with ext3. That or reinstall? Why would you keep your mail on your main partition anywho? If your drive fails your mail

Re: auto create features

I am not sure, but I guess you have already created the user inbox before posting the email to the account. However, by design autocreate patch does not function this way. In order the create on post feature of the autocreate patch be activated, no account at all must be pre-exist. If the mail

Re: unixhierarchysep: 1 (Was: Re: Web based administration interfaces...)

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, David Lang wrote: On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote: Okay, I tried this out, on an existing mail spool ... two words: ACK ACK! 'k, looking at the file system, to start, I'm seeing changes: The first mailbox is 'before' and the second is 'after': 12524 ./s/user

RE: Too slow

If I mount all partitions with async it's not getting better... :-( mmmh... > -Original Message- > From: Scott M. Likens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 10:30 PM > To: Sascha Bieler > Cc: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu > Subject: Re: Too slow > > Don't use

Re: Too slow

Don't use ext3? Honestly ext2/3 is fine and dandy, but gentoo does +S the /var/imap folder, so everything has to call a sync() That is slow on ext2/3, perhaps reiserfs or xfs would be better for you? On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 20:58:57 +0200 "Sascha Bieler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > >

RE: Too slow

Unfortunatly it's not better with 2.3.1. It takes about 3 Seconds to purge the for deletion flagged mails. Don't know why it's as slow now. Maybe it's got to do with the SMP-Kernel??? From: Patrick Radtke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, A

Too slow

Hi there, I am running cyrus-imapd-2.1.12 on a Gentoo Linux with kernel 2.6.15. Got a Pentium 4 Xeon 2,8 GHz and 2 GB Ram. The cyruspartition is ext3 on a SCSI RAID 5. hdparm -tT /dev/sda says: /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 2316 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1158.00 MB/sec Timing buffered disk r

Too slow

Hi there, I am running cyrus-imapd-2.1.12 on a Gentoo Linux with kernel 2.6.15. Got a Pentium 4 Xeon 2,8 GHz and 2 GB Ram. The cyruspartition is ext3 on a SCSI RAID 5. hdparm -tT /dev/sda says: /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 2316 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1158.00 MB/sec Timing buffered disk r

Re: more than one Sieve autoreply per day?

--On Friday, April 7, 2006 12:29 -0400 Phil Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Good point. Maybe there could be some throttling built into the "autoreply" extension that Ken says people have considered writing. 10 autoreplies per day per address or something. That would make it workable

Re: Too slow

On Apr 7, 2006, at 2:58 PM, Sascha Bieler wrote: Everythings working just fine, but when I want to delete an email it's so slowly... Has anyone a hint for me? I assume deleting is expunging the messages and not just flagging the messages as deleted.I don't have a hint for your setup, but  cyr

Re: cyrus virtual domains -- real not passed to saslauthd with virtdomains: userid

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, lartc wrote: hi all, no joy even after googling for hours and looking thru the archives ... i cannot get imap to pass the realm either in the userid or realm field to saslauthd. i can successfully authenticate [EMAIL PROTECTED] using testsaslauthd, however, imtest test fa

unixhierarchysep: 1 (Was: Re: Web based administration interfaces ...)

Okay, I tried this out, on an existing mail spool ... two words: ACK ACK! 'k, looking at the file system, to start, I'm seeing changes: The first mailbox is 'before' and the second is 'after': 12524 ./s/user/seminars/sent-mail 12532 ./s/user/seminars 12534 ./s/user 12536 ./s 8 ./

Re: cyrus virtual domains -- real not passed to saslauthd with virtdomains: userid

Am Fr, den 07.04.2006 schrieb lartc um 19:05: > i cannot get imap to pass the realm either in the userid or realm field > to saslauthd. saslauthd runs with parameter "-r"? Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/

cyrus virtual domains -- real not passed to saslauthd with virtdomains: userid

hi all, no joy even after googling for hours and looking thru the archives ... i cannot get imap to pass the realm either in the userid or realm field to saslauthd. i can successfully authenticate [EMAIL PROTECTED] using testsaslauthd, however, imtest test fails and debugging saslauthd does not

Re: auto create features

On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 13:19 +0300, Christos Soulios wrote: > When autocreate fails, it logs the error message to your syslog. (be sure > you do not filter out warnings). The patch for cyrus-2.3.x also logs debug > info to check if the patch was invoked. Unfortunately debug info are not > printed fo

Re: more than one Sieve autoreply per day?

On Apr 7, 2006, at 9:01 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote: --On Thursday, April 6, 2006 17:28 -0400 Phil Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My HR department is having a problem with their Sieve script. They want job applicants to receive an autoreply *every time* someone emails [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: reconstruct and seen db on 2.3.1

> Greets. > > I'm using cyrus-imapd-2.3.1-2.1and we had a major server crash recently > which forced us to recover all mailboxes from tape. We had no problems > restoring /var/spool/imap/ and /var/lib/imap and afterwards ran > reconstruct -rf on all mailboxes to get them into a sane state. We did >

RE: Virtual domains and [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Quoting Ciprian Vizitiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: It doesn't seem like Cyrus related but a MTA one. Anyway the question is (I think): do you have ONE Joe with ONE IMAP box and he should be able to receive mail on TWO domains? Or what you really have is TWO Joe(s) in TWO different domains but so it

reconstruct and seen db on 2.3.1

Greets. I'm using cyrus-imapd-2.3.1-2.1and we had a major server crash recently which forced us to recover all mailboxes from tape. We had no problems restoring /var/spool/imap/ and /var/lib/imap and afterwards ran reconstruct -rf on all mailboxes to get them into a sane state. We did all this bef

Re: more than one Sieve autoreply per day?

--On Thursday, April 6, 2006 17:28 -0400 Phil Durbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My HR department is having a problem with their Sieve script. They want job applicants to receive an autoreply *every time* someone emails [EMAIL PROTECTED] Imagine if someone sent mail to apply-hr and had

RE: Virtual domains and [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 10:18 +0200, Ciprian Vizitiu wrote: > Anyway the question is (I think): do you have ONE Joe with ONE IMAP box and > he should be able to receive mail on TWO domains? Or what you really have is > TWO Joe(s) in TWO different domains but so it happens that they "live" on > the sa

Re: more than one Sieve autoreply per day?

Phil Durbin wrote: My HR department is having a problem with their Sieve script. They want job applicants to receive an autoreply *every time* someone emails [EMAIL PROTECTED] Right now applicants are sometimes confused because they receive a reply for the first job they apply for, but if th

Re: auto create features

When autocreate fails, it logs the error message to your syslog. (be sure you do not filter out warnings). The patch for cyrus-2.3.x also logs debug info to check if the patch was invoked. Unfortunately debug info are not printed for cyrus 2.2.12. Cheers, Christos Craig White wrote: > I am using

RE: Virtual domains and [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

It doesn't seem like Cyrus related but a MTA one. Anyway the question is (I think): do you have ONE Joe with ONE IMAP box and he should be able to receive mail on TWO domains? Or what you really have is TWO Joe(s) in TWO different domains but so it happens that they "live" on the same IMAP box?