Hi!
Is it possible to add for domain or maybe group some users, to use
shared quotta. For example: client is allowed to create as many
mailboxes, but used space is limited. I need this because I would like
to create more flexible storage.
regards
Uros
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cm
Ken Murchison wrote:
Because the frontends proxy as the user to the backend, the IMAP LOGIN
command can not be used. The only plaintext SASL mechanism that can be
used is PLAIN, but you can't use it unless protected by TLS. Looking
at the CAPABILITY output above, it doesn't look like you've
Jeff Davis wrote:
I'm in the process of getting a new server up and running and would like
to force users to IMAPS, even if their client may not be configured to
use it.
Can anyone point me in the right direction as to the best way to
accomplish this? Or do I need to suck it up and reconfigu
On Dec 14, 2005, at 9:57 PM, John P. Speno wrote:
Hi, my name is John, and I'm a former unix sys admin but I gave it
up to be a programmer (yay python!). Now I'm back in the sys admin
game for a small family business that needs to scale its order
management system better and I think cyrus
--On December 14, 2005 8:57:01 AM -0500 "John P. Speno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi, my name is John, and I'm a former unix sys admin but I gave it up to
be a programmer (yay python!). Now I'm back in the sys admin game for a
small family business that needs to scale its order management
On Dec 14, 2005, at 12:00 PM, Jure Pečar wrote:About iSCSI ... any expirience with it? I know throughput is good enough, but what about latencies? Are they comparable with local disks or fibrechannel?I attended a "iSCSI is great" seminar last week, where a similar question was raised.Their answer (
I'm in the process of getting a new server up and running and would like
to force users to IMAPS, even if their client may not be configured to
use it.
Can anyone point me in the right direction as to the best way to
accomplish this? Or do I need to suck it up and reconfigure the 1000
client
Joseph Brennan wrote:
It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a
separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems
would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ?
Might as well just double their quota. They could create a whole
set o
--On Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:14 + Rob McMahon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash folder a
separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these problems
would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ?
Might a
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:22:37 -0600
Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to leave SMTP on the V480 and add a 2-node load-balancing
> cluster for IMAP. Each of the two servers would be a Sun V440 with 4
> CPUs and 16 GB of memory. They would run Solaris 10. Sun's QFS would
> provide s
Hi,
--On 14. Dezember 2005 08:57:01 -0500 "John P. Speno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi, my name is John, and I'm a former unix sys admin but I gave it up to
be a programmer (yay python!). Now I'm back in the sys admin game for a
small family business that needs to scale its order managemen
Our current SMTP and IMAP server is a Sun V480 with 4 CPUs and 16 GB
of memory. It's running Solaris 9. It has 300 GB of IMAP storage on
two 12-disk hardware RAID arrays. This contains about 30,000
mailboxes. There are about 1200 simultaneous IMAP sessions at the
busiest time of the day. It's
Looking a bit more at this:
Our sync server does advertise the correct mechanism
synctest -m PLAIN -t "" alpenwurst2
S: * SASL GSSAPI
S: * STARTTLS
S: * OK alpenwurst2.cc.columbia.edu Cyrus sync server v2.3-alpha
C: STARTTLS
S: OK Begin TLS negotiation now
verify error:num=19:self signed certifi
Patrice wrote:
Hi,
I try to install the the new version of cyrus-imap to use the replication.
but I can't authenticate on my replica server:
here is the error in the log:
sync_client[26757]: couldn't authenticate to backend server: no
mechanism available
here is the result of the synctest
Have you tried specifying what mechanism you want to use with synctest
with -m?
Its been a long time since I set this up (I started testing in May) so
hopefully I remember everything.
-Patrick
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Patrice wrote:
Hi,
I try to install the the new version of cyrus-imap to u
Hi,
I try to install the the new version of cyrus-imap to use the replication.
but I can't authenticate on my replica server:
here is the error in the log:
sync_client[26757]: couldn't authenticate to backend server: no
mechanism available
here is the result of the synctest:
S: * OK mails
> I know this is an old problem, but I'd like your thoughts.
>
> We need to apply quotas to our students for the obvious reasons, but
> face the old issue of having them hit their quotas and then being unable
> to move forward because deleting mail from the client (SquirrelMail)
> typically means m
Hi, my name is John, and I'm a former unix sys admin but I gave it up
to be a programmer (yay python!). Now I'm back in the sys admin game
for a small family business that needs to scale its order management
system better and I think cyrus and IMAP is just the thing, but I
just wanted to ge
Huaqing Zheng wrote:
On 12/12/05, Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.0. This is an
BETA-quality release, reflecting that it has significant numbers of new
features that have not been tested on a wide-scale basis, although
earlier ve
Carsten Hoeger wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, Ken Murchison wrote:
I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.0. This is an
BETA-quality release, reflecting that it has significant numbers of new
features that have not been tested on a wide-scale basis, although
earlier versions of thi
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Rob McMahon wrote:
> it. It occurred to me, though, that if we made the user.xxx.Trash
> folder a separate quota root with the same quota as their inbox these
> problems would go away. Can anyone see any problems with this ?
As long as you add a policy that Trash gets wipe
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:26:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I do apologize but I have a problem I cannot solve.
> I type:
>
> sasldblistusers2
>
> and I see that user cyrus exists in sasl2.db, that has 644 permissions.
yes this means that you have the user in your sasldb, but the error
i,
--On 14. Dezember 2005 13:26:00 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do apologize but I have a problem I cannot solve.
I type:
sasldblistusers2
and I see that user cyrus exists in sasl2.db, that has 644 permissions.
When I try
testsaslauthd -u cyrus -p cyrus
I found in /var/log/messages the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do apologize but I have a problem I cannot solve.
I type:
sasldblistusers2
and I see that user cyrus exists in sasl2.db, that has 644 permissions.
When I try
testsaslauthd -u cyrus -p cyrus
I found in /var/log/messages the following:
Dec 14 12:42:19 server imap(p
On Mon, Dec 12, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I am pleased to announce the release of Cyrus IMAPd 2.3.0. This is an
> BETA-quality release, reflecting that it has significant numbers of new
> features that have not been tested on a wide-scale basis, although
> earlier versions of this code have been
I do apologize but I have a problem I cannot solve.
I type:
sasldblistusers2
and I see that user cyrus exists in sasl2.db, that has 644 permissions.
When I try
testsaslauthd -u cyrus -p cyrus
I found in /var/log/messages the following:
Dec 14 12:42:19 server imap(pam_unix)[2999]: authenticati
I know this is an old problem, but I'd like your thoughts.
We need to apply quotas to our students for the obvious reasons, but
face the old issue of having them hit their quotas and then being unable
to move forward because deleting mail from the client (SquirrelMail)
typically means moving t
27 matches
Mail list logo
