On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote:
--On Sonntag, 17. Oktober 2004 15:30 Uhr +0200 Simon Matter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you try running with the default cyrus.conf just to see how it goes?
With the following line I get exactly 2 lmtpd running until mail arrives.
That's not the i
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Michael King wrote:
I believe removing the "c" flag will remove the rights to create subfolders.
You'll want to also remove the "a" flag, if set, as this will let them
change the ACLs on the folder in question.
I don't know if being owner of the folder will override this, but I
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Tom Bryntesen wrote:
What kind of authentication mechanisms do you recommend when
using Cyrus on a system with about 10.000 users. It may well be
about 1.000 concurrent connections, I guess. (RedHat Enterprise
AS server on two cluster-servers linked to a SAN-disk system
with th
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Dan Delaney wrote:
Hello all. Just starting to configure Cyrus and convert all of my mbox files
to it. I was wondering, is it the norm these days to use
"unixhierarchysep:yes"? Are there any modern email clients that don't work
either with it or without it?
None that I know
I'm trying to get cyradm to work with my cyrus (2.2.3) server using
GSSAPI. How do I get more debugging information from cyradm? All it
says is:
$ /opt/standalone/bin/cyradm -a gssapi imap
cyradm: cannot authenticate to server with gssapi as ian
$
(yes, the authentication works with imtest and w
I have a large scale cyrus-imap deployment with /var/spool/imap as a
seperate disk partition but that means configdirectory is on a different
filesystem.
For another installation I ould like to keep both, databases and
mailboxes, in a seperate partition. What should this look like? A
partition mou
> Then the problem is really that debian's postfix packages don't include
> postfix's SMTP AUTH/sasl patch, right? I've done a lot of postfix builds
> in the past and they're really nothing to be afraid of. Even on the
> machines where I run debian, I still build postfix from source to gain
> acc
Hi list...
What kind of authentication mechanisms do you recommend when
using Cyrus on a system with about 10.000 users. It may well be
about 1.000 concurrent connections, I guess. (RedHat Enterprise
AS server on two cluster-servers linked to a SAN-disk system
with the mail-/spool-store are planned
> No matter how I look at it, in order to do SMTP AUTH with encrypted
> passwords in the user database I still need the above mentioned patch
> for cyrus-sasl. Also means I still have to built everything from
> sources, including postfix.
Then the problem is really that debian's postfix packages d
> Why don't you use Debian packages for cyrus-sasl, cyrus-imapd and postfix?
> While not being a Debian user I'm quite sure those packages exist and will
> prevent from such mess.
I am only interested in plain password authentication, with encrypted
passwords kept in some database (trying mysql).
I have several mailboxes which are read-only accessible to a sizable but
finite group. One such mailbox is a repository for faculty news and I need
to maintain over 300 individual ACLs with "lrs" permissions. If this were a
static situation, it wouldn't be an issue, but membership is dynamic (ad
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:30:29AM -0700, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
> Other than obviously difficult characters to cope with like: "@%*
> -- is there anything that's likely to break the server by
> expanding the list of acceptable characters in mailbox names to
> at least come closer to matching the
Other than obviously difficult characters to cope with like: "@%*
-- is there anything that's likely to break the server by
expanding the list of acceptable characters in mailbox names to
at least come closer to matching the RFC (which allows any
printable ASCII character)?
Darrell
---
Cyrus Hom
Jure Pe_ar wrote:
Hi,
what exactly does this mean in quota -f -d dom.ain output?
dom.ain!user.username: quota root dom.ain!user.username --> (none)
dom.ain!user.username.Trash: quota root dom.ain!user.username --> (none)
IIRC, this means that the quota root file for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
missing, s
I have noticed a small fraction of lmtpunix log-entries containing control
characters, a sample from lmtpunix at debug level:
Oct 21 15:02:07 imap lmtpunix[2]: duplicate_check:
M-mZ-C^CqM-QsM-tS^AM-x]M-lM-XM-^V aslaug
1098965023
The line has been filter
Hi,
what exactly does this mean in quota -f -d dom.ain output?
dom.ain!user.username: quota root dom.ain!user.username --> (none)
dom.ain!user.username.Trash: quota root dom.ain!user.username --> (none)
--
Jure Pečar
http://jure.pecar.org/
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
C
16 matches
Mail list logo
