On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Edward Rudd wrote:
>You have encountered the famed DB4 and NPTL bug. Goto
>http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/cyrus-imapd/ and download the updated
>db4.spec for fedora core 1 and recompile.
Given I'd like to stay running a non-FC kernel (2.4.24), does this change
anything?
> Zitat von Cesar Scavuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> I think you mean this,
>>
>>
>> Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: connect from
>> unknown[192.168.1.97]
>> Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: DFC447413A:
>> client=unknown[192.168.1.97]
>> Feb 17 13:50:57 serverlnx postfi
On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 05:18, trichard wrote:
> I can authenticate to the server using a mail client now. However, when
> trying to read the inbox it fails with the following message:
>
> "The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: Invalid
> mailbox name."
(just a few guesse
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 00:36, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:
> Summary: I want to get imap running again, but it refuses to read my bdb
> (version 3) databases. How to I recover?
If you still have access to the original host, you can dump them using
Cyrus tools (most importantly `ctl_mboxlist -d` for mai
I'm trying deperately to put Postfix, Cyrus-IMAP, Web-Cyradm and MySQL to work, but
continously get lmtp errors in the logs. Can somebody please point me to where I
should
look?
/etc/cyrus.conf:
lmtpunix cmd="lmtpd" listen="/var/imap/socket/lmtp" prefork=0
/etc/postfix/master.cf:
lmtp
Thanks Mike...Results inline below:
Mike O'Rourke wrote:
try this:
imtest -u test -a test -t '' localhost
(after the -t those are 2 single-quotes.)
At the end of a lot of diagnostics, it should ask for your password.
type it in and hit . If it says "Authenticated", you are
connected and in;
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zitat von Cesar Scavuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I think you mean this,
Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: connect from
unknown[192.168.1.97]
Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: DFC447413A:
client=unknown[192.168.1.97]
Feb 17 13:50:5
Cesar Scavuzzo wrote:
I did what you suggested now the log file from the send mail look like
this:
Feb 17 17:09:34 localhost sendmail[7744]: i1HM9YoH007744:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=314, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feb 17 17:09:34 localhost sendmail[7746]: i1HM9Y
>>> "trichard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/17/04 10:18pm >>>
>>I feel like I am getting pretty close to having this work. I've
been
>>stuck for awhile on this one issue and I cannot find documentation
to
>>troubleshoot mailboxes and mail client access properly.
>>
>>I can authenticate to the server usi
Zitat von Cesar Scavuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think you mean this,
>
>
> Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: connect from
> unknown[192.168.1.97]
> Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: DFC447413A:
> client=unknown[192.168.1.97]
> Feb 17 13:50:57 serverlnx postfix/cleanu
I did what you suggested now the log file from the send mail look like
this:
Feb 17 17:09:34 localhost sendmail[7744]: i1HM9YoH007744:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=314, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feb 17 17:09:34 localhost sendmail[7746]: i1HM9YHI007746:
from=<[EMAIL
You have encountered the famed DB4 and NPTL bug. Goto
http://www.invoca.ch/pub/packages/cyrus-imapd/ and download the updated
db4.spec for fedora core 1 and recompile.
On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 10:36, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I hope this case isn't a 'told you so', but I have a bit of
>>> "trichard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/17/04 10:18pm >>>
>I feel like I am getting pretty close to having this work. I've been
>stuck for awhile on this one issue and I cannot find documentation to
>troubleshoot mailboxes and mail client access properly.
>
>I can authenticate to the server using a
Im setting up Cyrus on a SAN where /var/spool/imap is shared via the
san. I'm using the unified-imap branch as suggested by Ken Murchison.
Everything seems to be working except mupdate. When I try to create a
mailbox, I get the following error
localhost.localdomain> cm user.prentice
createmailb
yes I think you're right there is a lot to learn maybe I just not set
the DNS properly on the IMAP box?
If so could you lead me to where I can find a good howto or something
like that that can help me figure out?
thanks
cesar
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 15:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Zitat von Ces
Let me throw some more wrenches into this. I didn't mention this earlier because I
didn't think they were part of this problem, since according to the log the email was
making it to cyrus, but maybe I'm wrong.
I am trying to run sendmail, procmail and cyrus, because I still want some local
non
>>> Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/17/04 09:49pm >>>
>Cesar Scavuzzo wrote:
>
>>Feb 17 15:20:26 localhost sendmail[7783]: i1HKKP3n007783:
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=295, class=0, nrcpts=1,
>>msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Feb 17 15:20:26 localhost sendmail[7785]: i1HKKQJj007785:
>>
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> Thanks, that answered most of my questions. One last thing :
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:43:09PM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> > It mostly should depend on how much of the database is already populated
> > in the mupdate master. If there's nothing
I think you mean this,
Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: connect from
unknown[192.168.1.97]
Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: DFC447413A:
client=unknown[192.168.1.97]
Feb 17 13:50:57 serverlnx postfix/cleanup[2801]: DFC447413A:
message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feb 17 13:5
I think you mean this,
Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: connect from
unknown[192.168.1.97]
Feb 17 13:50:56 serverlnx postfix/smtpd[2799]: DFC447413A:
client=unknown[192.168.1.97]
Feb 17 13:50:57 serverlnx postfix/cleanup[2801]: DFC447413A:
message-id=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Feb 17 13:5
I feel like I am getting pretty close to having this work. I've been
stuck for awhile on this one issue and I cannot find documentation to
troubleshoot mailboxes and mail client access properly.
I can authenticate to the server using a mail client now. However, when
trying to read the inbox it f
Ken Murchison wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
I've actually been looking for more info on this type of thing, and here
is what I found:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
I can strip the address before tran
Cesar Scavuzzo wrote:
Feb 17 15:20:26 localhost sendmail[7783]: i1HKKP3n007783:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=295, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feb 17 15:20:26 localhost sendmail[7785]: i1HKKQJj007785:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=454, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAI
Thanks, that answered most of my questions. One last thing :
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:43:09PM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> It mostly should depend on how much of the database is already populated
> in the mupdate master. If there's nothing there, and the database is
> syncing on every write,
Zitat von Cesar Scavuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Feb 17 15:20:26 localhost sendmail[7783]: i1HKKP3n007783:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], size=295, class=0, nrcpts=1,
> msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Feb 17 15:20:26 localhost sendmail[7785]: i1HKKQJj007785:
> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> Why do you recommend *against* relying on this behavior ?
Because it takes much longer to write all the entires to the database than
just writing anything that the database has incorrect (as, I guess, you
discovered).
> For about 500K mailboxes (mailbo
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> > If the message is inserted directly into this folder via just lmtp,
> > then the Reply-To (Newsgroups, etc.) header won't be added anyway
>
> True, but if the client replies to more than just the Reply-To, then the
> post address will get exposed
Zitat von Cesar Scavuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Feb 17 13:08:39 serverlnx imap[2475]: accepted connection
> Feb 17 13:08:39 serverlnx master[2563]: about to exec
> /usr/lib/cyrus-imapd/imapd
> Feb 17 13:08:39 serverlnx imap[2563]: executed
> Feb 17 13:08:51 serverlnx imap[2475]: badlogin: [192.168
Feb 17 15:20:26 localhost sendmail[7783]: i1HKKP3n007783:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], size=295, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feb 17 15:20:26 localhost sendmail[7785]: i1HKKQJj007785:
from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=454, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, proto=ES
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
I've actually been looking for more info on this type of thing, and here
is what I found:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
I can strip the address before transferring the article v
Feb 17 12:20:32 serverlnx imap[2474]: login: serverlnx [127.0.0.1] cyrus
plaintext
Feb 17 12:25:28 serverlnx master[2534]: about to exec
/usr/lib/cyrus-imapd/ctl_cyrusdb
Feb 17 12:25:28 serverlnx ctl_cyrusdb[2534]: checkpointing cyrus
databases
Feb 17 12:25:28 serverlnx ctl_cyrusdb[2534]: archivin
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 12:18:05PM -0500, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Etienne Goyer wrote:
>
> > I was under the impression that the mailbox list kept on the MUPDATE
> > master was volatile, that is it was recreated from scratch at each
> > start-up with the mailbox list coming fr
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I've actually been looking for more info on this type of thing, and here
> is what I found:
>
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html
>
> I can strip the address before transferring the article via NNTP, but
Zitat von Cesar Scavuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> After several attempts and with the help of some persons of this list I
> manage to get my imap server running on a FC1 with no errors so far, I
> used the RPMS from invoca (2.2.3-4) those worked great, but the problem
> that I'm having is on the
> >>> "Henrik Troeng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/17/04 02:25pm >>>
> >> >>> "Henrik Troeng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/16/04 07:33pm >>>
> >> >
> >> >>Hi all,
> >> >>
> >> >>I have a problem, I use multiple domains but for users I create
> with
> >> >the
> >> >>domain specified, for example [EMAIL PROTECTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
Any article which gets posted to Cyrus nntpd will have the post address
added to the Reply-To header, and this address will be present in the
article when it is transferred to the outside news peer.
I thought I raised this conc
After several attempts and with the help of some persons of this list I
manage to get my imap server running on a FC1 with no errors so far, I
used the RPMS from invoca (2.2.3-4) those worked great, but the problem
that I'm having is on the distribution of e-mail (I'm real new on cyrus
why not to
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 13:24, Wil Cooley wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 11:06, Brenden Conte wrote:
> > In the install documents, it says to be sure to set the +S attribute in
> > the imap directory.
> >
> > Is there any hard reliance on this? If i use a filesystem that doesn't
> > support +S, are
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
> Any article which gets posted to Cyrus nntpd will have the post address
> added to the Reply-To header, and this address will be present in the
> article when it is transferred to the outside news peer.
I thought I raised this concern, but it may have j
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Carsten Hoeger wrote:
> I patched only master/master.c master/Makefile.in and configure.in similar to
> what contrib/drac_auth.patch does.
>
> The SLP behaviour is currently not configurable with my patch, but usually,
> that should not be neccessary, as a SLPRegister() call w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
I just committed this change to CVS. It seems to work just fine with
Mozilla, Outlook and Pine.
It also gave me the opportunity to cleanup the handling of netnews
specific headers (Path, Xref) and to actually append the post addr
On Tue, Feb 17, Ken Murchison wrote:
> > Btw.: Is there a specific reason, why the drac_auth patch is still not
> > integrated?
>
> Because its an outdated hack. Any recent MTA *should* have SMTP AUTH
> support and sites *should* be using it instead of DRAC. If you
> disagree, then argu
Prentice Bisbal wrote:
I'm using the unified imap tree (with some assistance from Ken
Murchison) to have 3 servers use the same filesystem on a SAN with GPFS.
When I start cyrus on either the master or the slaves, I get the errors
shown below. I think I just need to specify the database format(
>>> "Henrik Troeng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/17/04 02:25pm >>>
>> >>> "Henrik Troeng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/16/04 07:33pm >>>
>> >
>> >>Hi all,
>> >>
>> >>I have a problem, I use multiple domains but for users I create
with
>> >the
>> >>domain specified, for example [EMAIL PROTECTED] it can't
>> >re
Carsten Hoeger wrote:
> Btw.: Is there a specific reason, why the drac_auth patch is still not
integrated?
Because its an outdated hack. Any recent MTA *should* have SMTP AUTH
support and sites *should* be using it instead of DRAC. If you
disagree, then argue with Rob. ;)
--
Kenneth M
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Etienne Goyer wrote:
> I was under the impression that the mailbox list kept on the MUPDATE
> master was volatile, that is it was recreated from scratch at each
> start-up with the mailbox list coming from the backends.
It should be able to be reconstructed at startup of the
Oops. Forgot that I had backed up my /etc/sasldb2 and did not re-create a
cyrus user account in the new sasldb2. Sorry. :-/
This does bring up an interesting question though:
I created the cyrus user as follows:
saslpasswd2 -c -u post.mydomain.com cyrus
A sasldblistusers2 shows:
Ah, well. It was an idea. :-)
Thanks for all the help with this. I really appreciate it!
Will
--On Tuesday, 17 February, 2004 11:48 -0500 Rob Siemborski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, William K. Hardeman wrote:
Funny. I saw that in the IMSP server sources and didn't even twig
Hi Rob,
--On Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:48 AM -0500 Rob Siemborski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> Wouldn't it be better if this were filed as a bug with CMU and get the
|> service name changed in the server sources? That, to me, would seem to be
|> the better way to handle this going forward,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, William K. Hardeman wrote:
> Funny. I saw that in the IMSP server sources and didn't even twig that it
> was "imap" instead of "imsp", otherwise I would have modified the server
> sources.
>
> Wouldn't it be better if this were filed as a bug with CMU and get the
> service nam
Hi,
I was under the impression that the mailbox list kept on the MUPDATE
master was volatile, that is it was recreated from scratch at each
start-up with the mailbox list coming from the backends. I think I
found out the hard way that this is *not* the case. Is this correct ?
--
Etienne Goy
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Cyrus Daboo wrote:
> Agreed - I would rather fix Mulberry to be consistent with the other
> authenticators we support that do use 'imap' rather than 'imsp'. However,
> if a change to the server were to be made, perhaps it could be set to
> accept either 'imap' or 'imsp'? Or wo
Hi folks,
I hope this case isn't a 'told you so', but I have a bit of a problem...
Summary: I want to get imap running again, but it refuses to read my bdb
(version 3) databases. How to I recover?
I have been using Cyrus IMAPd 2.1.16 on a RH9 Linux server successfully
for some time now. I decide
Hello,
I am unable to login to my server with cyradm. What follows is my input
and the odd error message along with the auth.log and imapd.log. If
someone could please shed some light on what is wrong I would *really*
appreciate the help! ;)
Thanks,
-t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cyrus-imapd-2.2.3]# cy
I'm using the unified imap tree (with some assistance from Ken
Murchison) to have 3 servers use the same filesystem on a SAN with GPFS.
When I start cyrus on either the master or the slaves, I get the errors
shown below. I think I just need to specify the database format(s) in my
imapd.conf fil
Hi,
I need cyrus-imapd to register it's services to an slp daemon, if it is
running.
I prepared a patch against 2.2.3 using calls to functions of libslp of the
OpenSLP project:
http://www.openslp.org/
[...]
What is SLP?
Service Location Protocol is an IETF standards track protocol that
Howdy Cyrus,
Funny. I saw that in the IMSP server sources and didn't even twig that it
was "imap" instead of "imsp", otherwise I would have modified the server
sources.
Wouldn't it be better if this were filed as a bug with CMU and get the
service name changed in the server sources? That, to m
Hi William,
--On Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:52 AM -0500 "William K. Hardeman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I do have DIGEST-MD5 working with IMAP. Actually, in the 3 years I've
| been using both Cyrus IMAP and Cyrus IMSP, I've always been able to use
| DIGEST-MD5 on the IMAP connections and n
Howdy Cyrus,
Thanks for the reply.
I do have DIGEST-MD5 working with IMAP. Actually, in the 3 years I've been
using both Cyrus IMAP and Cyrus IMSP, I've always been able to use
DIGEST-MD5 on the IMAP connections and never on the IMSP connections.
IMAP connection with DIGEST-MD5 from the logs:
Hi William,
--On Tuesday, February 17, 2004 3:30 AM -0500 "William K. Hardeman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| My apologies for the cross-post, but I'm hoping to cover all bases with
| my question. :-)
|
| I've just upgraded my IMSP server to the lastest Cyrus 1.7b, as
| recommended by CMU. I had
Simon Matter said:
>> Simon: did you modify the code to use the mail facility instead of
>> local6?
>> Or was it a build configuration option that I missed?
>
> Yes, I did change it. The logging facility in the rpm is MAIL.
> And yes, it's a build time option, check doc/README.buildoptions.
>
A
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is not what I'm talking about. I stated earlier that the scripts
> are syntactically correct. In addition to that -- all requirements are
> in the scripts!
>
> I suspect this is a bug and it's load and/or uptime related.
> Question remains: did a
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 12:13:29PM +0100, Gregor Bruhin wrote:
> I don't know, I am just unable to reproduce the problem with some test
> mailboxes and different recent outlooks...
In the case I am aware of, you need to have UIDL of varying length.
Since POP3 UIDl are made by combining the mailbo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:24:29AM +1300, Simon Brady wrote:
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feb 15 04:26:00 host.cwi.nl lmtpd[28106]: [ID 358100 local6.info] sieve parse
error for user: line 7: fileinto not required
[...]
Did anyone experience th
>>> Christopher Paluch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/16/04 07:50pm >>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Mike O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Feb 16, 2004 12:42 PM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Virtual domains, [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mailbox unknown
>>
> Christopher Paluch <[EMAIL PROTEC
> >>> "Henrik Troeng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/16/04 07:33pm >>>
> >
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>I have a problem, I use multiple domains but for users I create with
> >the
> >>domain specified, for example [EMAIL PROTECTED] it can't
> >receive
> >>mail. When I try to send to this user I get back a reply
>>> "Henrik Troeng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/16/04 07:33pm >>>
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I have a problem, I use multiple domains but for users I create with
>the
>>domain specified, for example [EMAIL PROTECTED] it can't
>receive
>>mail. When I try to send to this user I get back a reply from
>Mailer-Daemon
Hi,
After a long bout of unrelated issues I have had a chance to revisit my
cyrus issues. I managed to reduce startup times by increasing the
frequency of checkpoints in cyrus.conf. I have installed pam_mysql 0.5
and recompiled sasl with a few options random being one and removed
unwanted mech
Hi,
--On Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2004 9:11 Uhr -0500 Eddy Beliveau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm using imapd-cyrus 2.1.15-2 on RedHat 9
I did the following commands:
# cd /tmp
# wget
# http://acs-wiki.andrew.cmu.edu/twiki/pub/Cyrus/Logwatch/cyrus.logwatch.t
# gz gunzip cyrus.logwatch.tgz
# cd
Howdy all,
My apologies for the cross-post, but I'm hoping to cover all bases with my
question. :-)
I've just upgraded my IMSP server to the lastest Cyrus 1.7b, as recommended
by CMU. I had hoped that, with that upgrade, I would finally be able to use
Digest-MD5 authentication to the IMSP serv
Simon,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:24:29AM +1300, Simon Brady wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Feb 15 04:26:00 host.cwi.nl lmtpd[28106]: [ID 358100 local6.info] sieve parse
> > error for user: line 7: fileinto not required
> > [...]
> > Did anyone experience this befo
71 matches
Mail list logo
