On Jan 21, 2004, at 2:09 PM, Pat Lashley wrote:
Another advantage of Exim is that if using LMTPd over TCP/IP for
Cyrus delivery, you can use a 'verify recipient/callout' ACL to
both test for the existance of virtual users and also to detect
Over Quota situations and issue a temporary failure code
This may sound stupid, but what is the syntax assigning a group to an
ACL in cyradm?
I saw the group:xxx syntax in the docs for 2.2.3, but I think that I
interpreted that wrong.
Thanks,
Tim
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 16:30:54 -0500 Scott Adkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, the aliases for postmaster and mailer-daemon are as follows:
postmaster: root+postmaster
mailer-daemon: root+mailer-daemon
The problem is that the mail isn't going *to* Mailer-Daemon, it is
comin
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:52 PM -0800 Pat Lashley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 14:22:33 -0600 Robert Covell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I too would be interested in the question about "abnormal amount of
emails to postmaster". We get about 15K a day of the
-- Scott Adkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on Mittwoch,
21. Januar 2004 16:30 Uhr -0500 regarding RE: postmaster mail:
The problem is that the mail isn't going *to* Mailer-Daemon, it is
coming *from* Mailer-Daemon *to* postmaster. So, setting the alias to
mailer-daemon isn't
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Rob Mueller wrote:
> Was in my original post...
>
> (gdb) p cache_ent
> $5 = 1
This is surprising, and does *not* mesh with the bug which I fixed. This
actually looks like a legitimately corrupted mailbox.
> This value seems odd though...
>
> $3 = 4294961280
> (gdb) p cache
> This sounds a *lot* like the bug I fixed right before release. And if
> thats the case, delivering message to the folder is also highly likely to
> fix the problem.
Hmmm, is it a variation on the same bug perhaps?
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x08074b41 in mail
Rob Siemborski wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Nils Vogels wrote:
You might be able to distill the information from the tracer logs, but
that would mean a full protocol dump to disk of each session, which does
not help the speed of your mailserver.
Indeed, this is the best option the current
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Scott Adkins wrote:
> What have you guys done? I am more interested in the larger email
> system, ones receiving on the order of 500k+ messages a day. Is it
> abnormal to see such a large volume of postmaster mail like this? Have
> any of you developed a sieve script that w
Prentice Bisbal wrote:
For redundancy, I was thinking of creating the IMAP folder dir and
spool dir on the SAN and then having two mailservers setup identically
using cyrus. If the primary server goes down for any reason, the
secondary would automatically begin receiving/delivering mail based
--On Wednesday, January 21, 2004 14:22:33 -0600 Robert Covell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I too would be interested in the question about "abnormal amount of emails
to postmaster". We get about 15K a day of these and just recently started
to pipe them into /dev/null. It is more of a burden to del
Ken Murchison wrote:
Does anyone out there actually disable singleinstancestore, and if so why?
Rob and I are working on some code changes and as part of them are
considering just having SIS always enabled. Is this going to create a
problem for any installations?
Never mind, I have already gon
I too would be interested in the question about "abnormal amount of emails
to postmaster". We get about 15K a day of these and just recently started
to pipe them into /dev/null. It is more of a burden to delete them
manually. Anyone else have high postmaster email counts?
Sincerely,
Robert T.
Okay, I thought I would pull from the wisdom from the group, but I hope it
isn't too far off topic.
We have been using an alias for the root account to get all root destined
mail to the /var/spool/mail/root mailbox, bypassing the Cyrus system.
However, our system has grown significantly over the ye
Prentice Bisbal wrote:
Ken, I'm not too familiar with QFS SANs. Does that have a filesystem
interfacewhere the filesystem itself allows multiple SAN clients to
access the same filesystem, etc?
Yes, its a shared filesystem. Multiple clients can r/w simultaneously.
What if the 2nd system was tre
Bill Earle wrote:
Ken,
We do NOT use singleinstancestore. We have several partitions for
spools. Is the feature intelligent enough to determine which spools
are on the same partition and hardlink those and create individual
files for spools on separate partitions?
Yes it is, and has been.
- we u
Hi everyone,
some weeks ago I posted a detailed description of my "lmtp read timeout"
- problem (
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&searchterm=read%20timeout&msg=26640
).
In the meantime I came a bit closer to a solution:
I did a backup of all the mails. I
Thanks guys... Adding the -a option to my procmail recipie did the trick!
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Moschallski
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 12:23 PM
To: Mike Bobbitt
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: deliver to fo
Ken,
We do NOT use singleinstancestore. We have several partitions for
spools. Is the feature intelligent enough to determine which spools
are on the same partition and hardlink those and create individual
files for spools on separate partitions?
- we use qmail and the deliver program, which is c
Try setting the p flag to user all on the folder if this doesn't work
run deliver with -a flag (man deliver)
Greets Kevin Moschallski
Am Mit, den 21.01.2004 schrieb Mike Bobbitt um 19:15:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm attempting to do the usual "deliver spam to a special folder" trick. Using
> sendmail-8.1
Ken, I'm not too familiar with QFS SANs. Does that have a filesystem
interfacewhere the filesystem itself allows multiple SAN clients to
access the same filesystem, etc?
What if the 2nd system was treated as a hot spare, and would't actually
do any mailserving functions until the primary server
Hi all,
I'm attempting to do the usual "deliver spam to a special folder" trick. Using
sendmail-8.12.10-1.1.1, procmail-3.22-11, spamassassin-2.62-2_8.rh9.at,
cyrus-sasl-2.1.15-6 and cyrus-imap-2.2.3.
All the sendmail/spamassassin/procmail stuff seems to work OK, and messages marked as
spam ar
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Ken Murchison wrote:
Does anyone out there actually disable singleinstancestore, and if so
why?
Rob and I are working on some code changes and as part of them are
considering just having SIS always enabled. Is this going to create a
problem for any installations?
If
Prentice Bisbal wrote:
I'm installing Cyrus on a ssytem that will have access to an IBM FAStT
SAN with GPFS (a parallel filesystem allowing multiple servers to share
a filesystem on a SAN).
For redundancy, I was thinking of creating the IMAP folder dir and spool
dir on the SAN and then having
Does anyone out there actually disable singleinstancestore, and if so why?
Rob and I are working on some code changes and as part of them are
considering just having SIS always enabled. Is this going to create a
problem for any installations?
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Softwar
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Nils Vogels wrote:
> > how do you do user accounting with Cyrus (how much data traffic is
> > caused by a single user account)?
>
> AFAIK, this is not a feature of Cyrus imapd.
That is correct.
> You might be able to distill the information from the tracer logs, but
> that w
can somebody tell me how I cant get cyrdump to dump me only the inbox ?
I can only dump the complete mailbos with chidren but I want only the
INBOX.
I tried cyrdump user/test/[EMAIL PROTECTED] but that doesn't work
and in the manpage there is no description about it.
I'm using cyrus 2.2.2
Cris
I'm installing Cyrus on a ssytem that will have access to an IBM FAStT
SAN with GPFS (a parallel filesystem allowing multiple servers to share
a filesystem on a SAN).
For redundancy, I was thinking of creating the IMAP folder dir and spool
dir on the SAN and then having two mailservers setup id
On Fri, Jan 16, Ken Murchison wrote:
> >What about this issue:
> >
> >http://asg.web.cmu.edu/archive/message.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus&searchterm=request%20info%20until%20later&msg=23996
> >
> >Using 2.2.3 and saslauthd I get the same error.
[...]
> >using cyrus-sasl-2.1.7
>
> 2.1.7 or 2.1
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rob Mueller wrote:
> I'm just testing out upgrading from cyrus 2.1.9 to cyrus 2.2.3. So far
> everything seems to work pretty much fine, except for one thing. On some
> existing folders, when you try to 'expunge' them, imapd segfaults. It's not
> all folders, only some folders
Hi
I'm just testing out upgrading from cyrus 2.1.9 to cyrus 2.2.3. So far
everything seems to work pretty much fine, except for one thing. On some
existing folders, when you try to 'expunge' them, imapd segfaults. It's not
all folders, only some folders, though it is reproduceable for the "broken"
31 matches
Mail list logo
