Re: Two little questions

Thanks Ken for your helpful answer. On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 12:00:49PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > Etienne Goyer wrote: > > 2. Apparently, we hit a bug where Oulook 2k2 seem to get confused with > > Cyrus's UIDL using POP. My understanding of the problem is only partial > > has I was not the on

Re: Cyrus and RH9

Try using Simon Matter's RPMS. http://home.teleport.ch/simix/ Then you don't have to worry about dependency issues.. But as your problem, most likely you don't have the devel package installed for cyrus-sasl. But using the RPMS will avoid that as they are already built. On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 12:

Cyrus and RH9

Hi to all! I've been trying install Cyrus and really can't. Always appear error what can't link library libsasl2 and i install from CMU tarball. any idea??

Re: How to tackle delegation in 2.1.15

On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 09:04, Rob Siemborski wrote: > 2.2 has what you want. People are using it successfully in production. > It should be non-beta by the end of the year. I knew as much, and suspected the timeline you mention. However 2.2 is a non-option. Basically: at the slightest snafu, we'

Re: Two little questions

Etienne Goyer wrote: Hi list, Two questions for resident gurus this morning : 1. Is there a way to permit only POP or IMAP for a specific user ? We are currently using saslauthd + shadow (Simon Matter's rpm, for the record). Not using this combo. If you can use PAM, this becomes fairly triv

Two little questions

Hi list, Two questions for resident gurus this morning : 1. Is there a way to permit only POP or IMAP for a specific user ? We are currently using saslauthd + shadow (Simon Matter's rpm, for the record). 2. Apparently, we hit a bug where Oulook 2k2 seem to get confused with Cyrus's UIDL usin

Re: How to tackle delegation in 2.1.15

On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Diego Rivera wrote: > Is this even possible in 2.1.15? I realize that granting or denying ACL > rights to the admin user at a granular per-mailbox level might be a way > to do it, but this would clearly become a maintenance nightmare. It is not possible in 2.1.15 > I realiz

Re: Hashing database files?

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003, Bill Earle wrote: > Is there a good document that describes how mailboxes.db and others are > accessed? Not beyond the source code. Unless you mean vaguely, in which case: http://asg1.web.cmu.edu/twiki/bin/view/Cyrus/WhatDatabaseBackend May be what you need. We're trying

Re: Cyrus RPMs

Your best bet would probably be Simon Matter's rpm : http://home.teleport.ch/simix/ -- Etienne GoyerLinux Québec Technologies Inc. http://www.LinuxQuebec.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Hashing database files?

On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Bill Earle wrote: > > > - I hope this isn't the case. > > Why not? We are having contention problems with a single file and the multiple files may help. In our current config., deliverdb uses about 12 GB spread across our backends

sieveshell auth on sasldb

I'm having some problems with sieveshell authentication. I can get it to work partially, but I do not understand why one works and the other does not. sieveshell documentation seems a little thin, but this is probably because it's one of those things that pretty simple to get working. I have not

Re: Return permanent failure on quota

Ramprasad A Padmanabhan wrote: I want to bounce back mails immediately if the mailbox quota is exceeded. Can I do this with just some parameter change Thanks Ram Enable "lmtp_over_quota_perm_failure: 1" in imapd.conf. --Christian

Return permanent failure on quota

I want to bounce back mails immediately if the mailbox quota is exceeded. Can I do this with just some parameter change Thanks Ram