On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Thomas Luzat wrote:
> According to the above site the bug is fixed in the latest cyrus21-imapd
> (of Debian) - why imapd and why not SASL? I'm really confused.
>From the changelog that closed the bug:
* Document that SASL is still braindamaged re. reentry in double linkage
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Pat Lashley wrote:
> Are there any tools for the mail admin to use to edit, or at least
> view, annotations on messages and mailboxes/folders?
Viewing can be done with the cyradm info command.
Currently, there isn't a way to set an annotation, mostly because we've
been lazy
Are there any tools for the mail admin to use to edit, or at least
view, annotations on messages and mailboxes/folders?
Thanks,
-Pat
figured as much.
I upgraded to OpenLDAP 2.1.22, and recompiled a TON of stuff that goes
with it
The upside is that the setup this is for is still experimental, so
there's still time for newer distros (like Mandrake 9.2 which is just
around the corner) to incorporate all the stuff I need alrea
Hello all
I'm attempting a setup which allows me to have multiple completely
separate mail domains in my server (separate IMAP boxes, separate
delivery via Postfix, etc...).
I've run into one snag though - probably because I don't understand SASL
as well as I'd like, but please gimme a hand here.
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 10:15, Rob Siemborski wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Diego Rivera wrote:
> No, it doesn't. I'd be willing to look at a patch that did this (as long
> as it was option-controlled).
That would be the idea...something like:
$ ./reconstruct (...classic-params...) -X
would wor
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 18:53, Phil Brutsche wrote:
> Diego Rivera wrote:
> > My question is: am I totally screwed? Will I be forced to go to
> > OpenLDAP 2.1.X and recompile EVERYTHING that touches LDAP (especially
> > hoping that 2.1.X is backward-compatible with 2.0.X)?
>
> You're not the only p
> This is probably being caused by the IMAP INTERNALDATE which is going to
> be the same regardless of the contents of the Received header.
What I didn't tell you is that the clients currently fetch their mails using
POP3 Sorry for this incomplete information.
As far as I can see from the headers
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Alexander Veit wrote:
> > You can modify the source to do it but I'm not sure why you'd want to.
>
> I use Cyrus on a computer that has no MX record and no static IP. Fetchmail
> polls mailboxes at my ISP, forwards them to Postfix which finally delivers
> them to Cyrus mailbox
Diego Rivera wrote:
My question is: am I totally screwed? Will I be forced to go to
OpenLDAP 2.1.X and recompile EVERYTHING that touches LDAP (especially
hoping that 2.1.X is backward-compatible with 2.0.X)?
You're not the only person to get bitten by this (nss_ldap uses OpenLDAP
2.0 which uses SA
> You can modify the source to do it but I'm not sure why you'd want to.
I use Cyrus on a computer that has no MX record and no static IP. Fetchmail
polls mailboxes at my ISP, forwards them to Postfix which finally delivers
them to Cyrus mailboxes. The polling intervals can become very long (up to
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Hank Beatty wrote:
> Took dir.txt and converted it to the format of mboxlist file (except for
> the tab on the end of each line. Not sure if this caused a problem)
This will likely cause a problem with the ACLs.
> The above steps got POP working, but IMAP gives ???Mailbox do
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Diego Rivera wrote:
> Would it be feasible/acceptable to add a '--status' (-S?) flag to
> reconstruct for such occasions? That way, reconstruct could check the
> X-Status header and set the appropriate bits in the index/cache
> databases when "recovering" a migrated mailbox.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Alexander Veit wrote:
> Is there a way to prevent Cyrus from adding a received header to the mails
> it receives?
You can modify the source to do it but I'm not sure why you'd want to.
-Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski
Hi Diego,
I ran into the same problem several times because I simply couldn't
believe this limitation exists. I always thought it was a mistake on my
side.
I'm using OpenLDAP, Cyrus-sasl, Cyrus-IMAPd and Postfix. I'm using RedHat
so I'm also using OpenLDAP 2.0.x! This results in the following
lim
15 matches
Mail list logo
