Re: cyrus-imspd-v1.6a3 Solaris 8 (sparc): gcc or cc

2003-02-10 Thread John A. Tamplin
Gloria Rom wrote: Do I *have* to use gcc to compile cyrus-imspd-v1.6a3 on Solaris 8 (sparc)? Has anybody used /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc (Forte 6 update 2) instead of gcc? I haven't tried imspd, but there were a couple of minor edits required to use SUNWspro rather than gcc for imapd. The auto-ge

cyrus-imspd-v1.6a3 Solaris 8 (sparc): gcc or cc

2003-02-10 Thread Gloria Rom
Hello Solaris admins, Do I *have* to use gcc to compile cyrus-imspd-v1.6a3 on Solaris 8 (sparc)? Has anybody used /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc (Forte 6 update 2) instead of gcc? -- Gloria Rom UCLA Library Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: procmail revisited

2003-02-10 Thread Brandon High
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 12:31, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > Just a couple questions, you call procmail from sendmail using the $h, > $f, and $u variables. I understand $u is the logname, or username, > and $h is the plussed address extension, but what is $f? I've looked > for some explanation of these va

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Jay Levitt
> I just did some testing myself with Outlook 2000 and Outlook Express 6. > I couldn't get either client to hang after doing APPENDs (with IDLE > enabled). OE does close the connection after calling IDLE after the > final APPEND however. FWIW, and not that it matters in this case, OE and Outlook

Re: procmail revisited

2003-02-10 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 02/10/03 10:28 AM, Brandon High sat at the `puter and typed: > On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 21:21, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > > Anyway, I have procmail being called from sendmail using the > > following: > > > > define(`CYRUS_MAILER_FLAGS',`SA5@|:/w') > > define(`CYRUS_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/local/bin/procmai

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
From: Fritz Test <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 09 Feb 2003 11:25:37 +0100 [...] With help of the analysis of Jeremy (Thanks) I patched the function mkgmtime, such that it works for me now. The problem is, that gmtime(&t) returns a null pointer for my 64-bit system if t is out of some ran

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Ken Murchison
Per Steinar Iversen wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Per Steinar Iversen wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > > > The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE > > > extension and Outlook is using it. I'm not sure why the client would be > > > IDLEing i

Re: procmail revisited

2003-02-10 Thread Brandon High
On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 21:21, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > Anyway, I have procmail being called from sendmail using the > following: > > define(`CYRUS_MAILER_FLAGS',`SA5@|:/w') > define(`CYRUS_MAILER_PATH',`/usr/local/bin/procmail') > define(`CYRUS_MAILER_USER',`cyrus:mail') > > define(`CYRUS_MAILER_ARG

Re: Cyrus 2.1.11 on BSDi 4.3.1

2003-02-10 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Echo Online Development Team wrote: > Does anyone have any experience doing this migration (From Berkeley to > Skiplist)? We have aprox. 12,000 active mailboxes - what potential > issues could we run into? A good number of sites have done this. You want to back up your conf

Re: Cyrus 2.1.11 on BSDi 4.3.1

2003-02-10 Thread Echo Online Development Team
Does anyone have any experience doing this migration (From Berkeley to Skiplist)? We have aprox. 12,000 active mailboxes - what potential issues could we run into? What impact will this have on the performance of our IMAP server? Thanks in advance, M. Gamble On Monday, February 10, 2003, at

BerkleyDB

2003-02-10 Thread Jeff Wilde
smime.p7m Description: application/pkcs7-mime

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Per Steinar Iversen
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Per Steinar Iversen wrote: > On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE > > extension and Outlook is using it. I'm not sure why the client would be > > IDLEing in between APPENDs, but I've grown accustomed

Re: informing users about quotas

2003-02-10 Thread Eric . Doutreleau
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, John Alton Tamplin wrote: Hi Thanks for your answer I m interested by your code to test it and perhaps use it :) > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >What is your custom delivery program? > >I'm interested in that kind of solution but i didn't found yet a deliver > >program

Re: Cyrus 2.1.11 on BSDi 4.3.1

2003-02-10 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Echo Online Development Team wrote: > Greetings, I hope I am posting the problem to the right list, if not, > please direct me to the appropriate list. > > We are having a serious issue with Cyrus on BSDi 4.3.1. Over time > (aprox 24 hours) Cyrus begins to slow down to the poi

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Per Steinar Iversen
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Ken Murchison wrote: > The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE > extension and Outlook is using it. I'm not sure why the client would be > IDLEing in between APPENDs, but I've grown accustomed to seeing silly > behavior from Outlook and Netscape. What

Re: informing users about quotas

2003-02-10 Thread John Alton Tamplin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is your custom delivery program? I'm interested in that kind of solution but i didn't found yet a deliver program for postfix that use lmtp and can add the ignorequota option. It is a small perl program that uses Net::LMTP (hacked to support authentication and the

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Ken Murchison
The obvious difference here is that Cyrus 2.1 supports the IDLE extension and Outlook is using it. I'm not sure why the client would be IDLEing in between APPENDs, but I've grown accustomed to seeing silly behavior from Outlook and Netscape. What method for IDLE did you configure with? (doing a '

Re: not able to receive mails in cyrus-postfix

2003-02-10 Thread srikarreddy kasarla
--- Mitrana Cristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:31, srikarreddy kasarla > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > Your Postfix runs chroot-ed and cannot access the > file > /var/imap/socket/lmtp. > > mitu thank you mitu, it's

Re: not able to receive mails in cyrus-postfix

2003-02-10 Thread srikarreddy kasarla
--- Mitrana Cristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:31, srikarreddy kasarla > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > Your Postfix runs chroot-ed and cannot access the > file > /var/imap/socket/lmtp. > how to know if my postfix i

Re: not able to receive mails in cyrus-postfix

2003-02-10 Thread Mitrana Cristian
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 14:31, srikarreddy kasarla wrote: > Hello, > Your Postfix runs chroot-ed and cannot access the file /var/imap/socket/lmtp. mitu

not able to receive mails in cyrus-postfix

2003-02-10 Thread srikarreddy kasarla
Hello, i need a help regarding receiving mail in cyrus.

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Per Steinar Iversen
On 8 Feb 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > Outlook can behave very strangely sometimes. I have certainly noticed that the main method for handling IMAP errors and problems is to just freeze :-) -psi

Any suggestion ?

2003-02-10 Thread Lin Wang
BlankHello, All: When I installed db-4.0.14, cyrus-sasl-2.1.6 and cyrus-imapd-2.1.5 on a new Solaris platform, with gcc-2.95.3, make-3.79.1 and perl-5.8.0, which went through on another machine. Unfortunately this time there was a strange problem which had tortured me for a whole day: When I c

Re: Outlook 2002 vs. Cyrus 2.1.12

2003-02-10 Thread Per Steinar Iversen
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: >Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:44:17 +0100 (CET) >From: Per Steinar Iversen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I just tried to copy a large number of messages from an Outlook PST file >to an IMAP server running Cyrus 2.1.12, but Outlook 2002 SP2 would

Re: informing users about quotas

2003-02-10 Thread Eric . Doutreleau
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, John A. Tamplin wrote: > Quoting Hans Wilmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > how can users securely be informed about their quota usage? > > > > It seems to be left to the clients to ignore or to not ignore the > > warnings from cyrus. Unfortunately, the mozilla client ignores the