--On Saturday, November 23, 2002 12:49 PM -0800 Bill Wester
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| So with Cyrus, how did you get spamassassin to run? That is the problem
| im having is there is not a tight well done integration between
| sendmail/postfix -> spamassassin -> cyrus ->sieve -> spam happiness
I am using spamass-milter with sendmail. I works like a charm.
Harris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Wester
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Ron Roskens
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SpamAssassin & Sieve?
So with
Bill Wester wrote:
So with Cyrus, how did you get spamassassin to run? That is the problem
im having is there is not a tight well done integration between
sendmail/postfix -> spamassassin -> cyrus ->sieve -> spam happiness!!!
any clues as to how your doing this part?
http://www.spamassassin.o
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Bill Wester wrote:
> So with Cyrus, how did you get spamassassin to run? That is the problem
> im having is there is not a tight well done integration between
> sendmail/postfix -> spamassassin -> cyrus ->sieve -> spam happiness!!!
>
> any clues as to how your doing this p
Dave,
Thanks for the reply. It turned out the problem was not a quota issue.
For some reason deliver wants to be run as group wheel. User cyrus is
a memeber of group wheel and when I run deliver on command line all is
fine. However, when sendmail fork deliver to run as user cyrus it
doesn'
So with Cyrus, how did you get spamassassin to run? That is the problem
im having is there is not a tight well done integration between
sendmail/postfix -> spamassassin -> cyrus ->sieve -> spam happiness!!!
any clues as to how your doing this part?
bill
Ron Roskens wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Ken Murchison wrote:
> CMU is using SpamAssassin, and I believe Rob successfully tested the
> Sieve relational extension with it when I first implemented it. I don't
> know if they are using it in production yet.
"In Production" where it's on our production servers but it's
Darrell Berry wrote:
>
> We're just matching on the X-Spam-Level tag, and that seems ok for the
> moment -- does anyone have more information on the numeric comparison
> extension you mentioned? I'm sure there will come a day when we ned
> something more fine-grained...
http://www.ietf.org/inte
We're just matching on the X-Spam-Level tag, and that seems ok for the
moment -- does anyone have more information on the numeric comparison
extension you mentioned? I'm sure there will come a day when we ned
something more fine-grained...
thx
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I guess slightly off-
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on Samstag,
23. November 2002 9:02 Uhr -0600 regarding SpamAssassin & Sieve?:
I guess slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if any folks on here are
using SpamAssassin, and if so, what sort of Sieve scripts you're using on
such tagged mail. I kno
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:02:00 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: SpamAssassin & Sieve?
>
> I guess slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if any folks on here are
> using SpamAssassin, and if so, what sort of Sieve s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I guess slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if any folks on here are
> using SpamAssassin, and if so, what sort of Sieve scripts you're using on
> such tagged mail. I know that recent releases of Sieve have a numeric
> comparator. Are you using that somehow, or
I guess slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if any folks on here are
using SpamAssassin, and if so, what sort of Sieve scripts you're using on
such tagged mail. I know that recent releases of Sieve have a numeric
comparator. Are you using that somehow, or just a simple match on the
"X-Spa
> Boy, what a nightmare this turned out to be.
Yep. It aint easy :)
>
> I've been running the cyrus-imapd-2.0.16 rpms developed by Ramiro which
> can be found here:
> http://rmorales.modwest.com/rpms/cyrus-imapd/
>
> and I figured it was time to upgrade to the 2.1.* series, so I got the
> sourc
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Jim Worke wrote:
> Currently, I'm using cyrus-imapd-2.1.9 and cyrus-sasl-2.1.7. I've installed
> cyrus-sasl-plain and cyrus-sasl-md5 RPM. When I use plain text
> authentication, it goes to saslauthd to PAM. But when I set the client to
> use CRAM-MD5, the log shows that it'
Is there a reason existing C IMAP APIs aren't good enough? (e.g. UW's
cclient, or the imclient piece of libcyrus, if youre a bit more daring).
-Rob
On 23 Nov 2002, Achim Altmann wrote:
> hello,
>
> we would like have a api to connect from a C++ progr. to cyrus.
> We have to delete some messages
hello,
we would like have a api to connect from a C++ progr. to cyrus.
We have to delete some messages from cyrus-mail-folder with our C++
Progr.
Please could any tell me where can i find a api was work with C++ and
cyrus?
Thank's a lot for any help
Achim
17 matches
Mail list logo
