This question comes up constantly. You need to assign the cyrus admin
the "c" ACL to the folder. The man page is confusing, because it says
you need the "d" ACL, and then later lists "c" as the correct ACL. "c"
is the correct ACL for folder deletion.
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
TCS Departm
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Felix Cuello wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 11:20:22AM -0500, Kervin L. Pierre wrote:
> > Try running ethereal and listening to the ldap traffic when the bad
> > logins occur. Or running OpenLDAP with extra logging.
>
>
> Sorry for the long post, but... do you think that thi
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Felix Cuello wrote:
> Well... doing a 100 repeats using testsaslauthd... I discovered that
> error is "cyclic"... :-)
>
> ./testsaslauthd -u fcuell -p secret -R 100
>
> [all other tests like 0,1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10, etc. works fine]
> 3: NO "authentication failed"
> 8: NO "authen
Hey all,
Just a quick question on a point I seem to be stuck...
How can I delete folders outside of the user area?
People are able to create folders in a level above their
inbox, but they can't delete them, I don't seem to be
able to delete them through cyradmin either (no it's
not an ACL problem)
I just finished migrating our mail server to Cyrus 2.1.9 and while the
SQUAT feature is great, it takes a few hours for squatter to grind through
the mailboxes. I thought a simple improvement would be to add a command
line option (-s) to skip indexing mailboxes whose cyrus.squat file has a
late
While I still hope to get something else working -
In my perfect world I would have kerberos working between the
systems (right now I have working krb5.conf, and a keytab, and I can
kinit against the W2K KDC, but saslauthd/pam_krb5, saslauthd/kerberos5
and GSSAPI all are unhappy)
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Felix Cuello wrote:
> I solved my problem with sasl... just changing the line of fork
> process,
>
> What do you think about this problem?, saslauthd comes with 5 fork
> process maximum, now (only for testing and tunning) y replaced this with
> 40 fork process... it's too much.
Sorry, I was not meaning to imply that you were responsible for
the documentation.
I believe many months ago Ken produced an ASCII chart that
graphically represented much of this.
I did not understand it at the time, and I am not sure I fully
grasp it yet, but I am an a
I solved my problem with sasl... just changing the line of fork
process,
What do you think about this problem?, saslauthd comes with 5 fork
process maximum, now (only for testing and tunning) y replaced this with
40 fork process... it's too much... but it works!...
How can I tune this?
Thanks a
Petre Agenbag wrote:
>
> Hi
> I don't know if this is a stupid question, but it's been asked of me,
>
> The sysadmin of another ISp wanted to know "how big is the
> authentication" on my server.
> It runs cyrus & sendmail and I use SASL for authentication.
> I guess what they want is the packet
On 7 Nov 2002, Petre Agenbag wrote:
> The sysadmin of another ISp wanted to know "how big is the
> authentication" on my server.
> It runs cyrus & sendmail and I use SASL for authentication.
> I guess what they want is the packet size or "overhead" in the
> connection to authenticate.
> Is this ob
David,
I have a setup where I have Cyrus is using saslauthd. Saslauthd is setup to
use PAM. Pam is using PAM_LDAP and PAM_LDAP is authenticating against a MS
AD domain controller.
That was probably the long way around, but it made sense at the time.
If you (or anyone else) is interested in how I
Hi
I don't know if this is a stupid question, but it's been asked of me,
The sysadmin of another ISp wanted to know "how big is the
authentication" on my server.
It runs cyrus & sendmail and I use SASL for authentication.
I guess what they want is the packet size or "overhead" in the
connection t
Well... doing a 100 repeats using testsaslauthd... I discovered that
error is "cyclic"... :-)
./testsaslauthd -u fcuell -p secret -R 100
[all other tests like 0,1,2,4,5,6,7,9,10, etc. works fine]
3: NO "authentication failed"
8: NO "authentication failed"
13: NO "authentication failed"
18: NO "
I comiled testsaslauthd to check connections and it fails sometimes!
[root@sinclair saslauthd]# ./testsaslauthd -u fcuell -p secret -R 10
0: OK "Success."
1: OK "Success."
2: OK "Success."
3: NO "authentication failed"
4: OK "Success."
5: OK "Success."
6: OK "Success."
7: OK "Success."
8: NO
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Felix Cuello) writes:
> Nov 7 15:00:11 sinclair pop3d[3432]: login: sinclair[200.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> fcuell plaintext
> Nov 7 15:00:49 sinclair saslauthd[554]: AUTHFAIL: user=fcuell
> service=pop realm=
Are you authenticating via PAM? You might need to add an entry for
"pop" in /
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 02:01:02PM -0500, Erik Enge wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Felix Cuello) writes:
>
> > Nov 7 15:00:11 sinclair pop3d[3432]: login: sinclair[200.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> > fcuell plaintext
> > Nov 7 15:00:49 sinclair saslauthd[554]: AUTHFAIL: user=fcuell
> > service=pop realm=
>
> Are
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Felix Cuello wrote:
> Hello!
>
>I'm still in troubles... working with Cyrus 2.1.9 and SASL 2.1.9,
>doing authentication into an openldap server... this error appers
>in my /var/log/messages
>
> Nov 7 15:00:11 sinclair pop3d[3432]: login: sinclair[200.xxx.xxx.xxx]
Hello!
I'm still in troubles... working with Cyrus 2.1.9 and SASL 2.1.9,
doing authentication into an openldap server... this error appers
in my /var/log/messages
Nov 7 15:00:11 sinclair pop3d[3432]: login: sinclair[200.xxx.xxx.xxx]
fcuell plaintext
Nov 7 15:00:49 sinclair saslauthd[55
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 11:20:22AM -0500, Kervin L. Pierre wrote:
> Try running ethereal and listening to the ldap traffic when the bad
> logins occur. Or running OpenLDAP with extra logging.
Sorry for the long post, but... do you think that this could be the
problem?, How can I solve that?
S
saslauthd+ldap is very reliable for me. I had this one issue which seem
ed to occur when I restarted OpenLDAP, but I think that's been fixed in CVS.
Maybe you should upgrade LDAP to 2.1.x series?
Try running ethereal and listening to the ldap traffic when the bad
logins occur. Or running Ope
I've been talking to Simon somewhat about his API. He doesn't think it
would be hard to implement a compatibility layer; I suspect he's a
little optimistic but I'm hopeful we'll all come to the same API
eventually.
Larry
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 22:48:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Rob Siemborski <[EMAI
"Schmehl, Paul L" wrote:
>
> Did you use the --enable-netscapehack configuration option?
This hack has nothing to do with what is being discussed.
There is no bug in Cyrus. The 'Trash' folder concept is actually a hack
on top of the IMAP delete/expunge methodology. When an IMAP client
DELET
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I will need to migrate a few users which were on an old OpenBSD mail server
> using the original BSD mailbox format to the new Cyrus v2.1.9 mailstore
> format. I've already read the book Managing IMAP but unfortunately their
> scripts are for Cyrus v1.5 w
Did you use the --enable-netscapehack configuration option?
Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
TCS Department Coordinator
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
> -Original Message-
> From: Toomas Vann [mailto:tom@;bns.ee]
> Sent: Thursday,
"David H. Lynch Jr." wrote:
>
> Ron, Thank you;
>
> I am still trying to "grok" the authentication/authorization
> process for Cyrus IMAP.
>
> It does not help that virtually all the "HOWTO's" that are on
> the net, as well as the book,
> are all pretty much obsolete an
I have just installed cyrus 2.0.16 and I get the following error
Nov 7 05:39:31 carp sendmail[25538]: gA7BcxV5025177: SYSERR(root):
makeconnection_ds: unsafe domain socket
in my messages log.
# standard standalone server implementation
START {
# do not delete these entries!
mboxlist c
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote:
> It does not help that virtually all the "HOWTO's" that are on
> the net, as well as the book,
> are all pretty much obsolete and this particular issue is the one
> they are most out of date about.
These resources aren't maintained by us,
It simply looks like Netscape 7 only sends the IMAP EXPUNGE command after
closing the application. Have a look maybe for an option in Netscape which
sounds like "expunge mailbox after deleting mail". I have no clue if this
exists but that's your problem, but for sure not a bug.
Regards
Marc
|
I think you're asking this question in the wrong place but anyway, what
is the log output when you try to send email to other domains?
Yosvany Llerena RodrÃguez wrote:
This is my firt experience with sendmail.
I have installed and listening SendMail V9 in the 25 por
Hi there,
I'm using both IMP and Mozilla 1.1 which is very similar to yours. I
have that 'problem' as well but if you take a look at IMP's Trash after
deleting your email in Netscape, you'll notice that the email is both in
Trash and striked out in Inbox at the same time. Only after you close
Hello,
I will need to migrate a few users which were on an old OpenBSD mail server
using the original BSD mailbox format to the new Cyrus v2.1.9 mailstore
format. I've already read the book Managing IMAP but unfortunately their
scripts are for Cyrus v1.5 which was a bit different from Cyrus v2 bec
Hello!
I'm actually working with Cyrus 2.1.9 and sasl2.1.9 and sometimes
(solved the entrophy problem) my POP server sometimes returns
incrrect username or password. It could be because I'm using ldap
beta support of saslauthd?. I'm working with LDAP 2.0.23.
Thanks a lot!
Felix
Ron, Thank you;
I am still trying to "grok" the authentication/authorization
process for Cyrus IMAP.
It does not help that virtually all the "HOWTO's" that are on
the net, as well as the book,
are all pretty much obsolete and this particular issue is the
one they
Hi!
I am new to Cyrus imapd and i recall reading somewhere that Cyrus
has problems with Netscape Mail Client deleting mail, but dont recall
from where i saw that?
OK, problem is that when deleting mail with Netscape Mail, mail is
moved to Trash folder but if i use a webmail client (IMP) then
i se
35 matches
Mail list logo
