David Wright wrote:
>
> Does ANYONE have the following configuration working?
>
> cyrus-imapd-2.0.x authenticating via LDAP using sasl_pwcheck_method: PAM
> and the pam_ldap module
>
> If so, please chime in to say on what system and how you got it to work.
> I can't imagine this configuration
> On Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:44:07 -0700,
> David Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (dw) writes:
dw> Does ANYONE have the following configuration working?
dw> cyrus-imapd-2.0.x authenticating via LDAP using sasl_pwcheck_method:
dw> PAM and the pam_ldap module
On a test Solaris 8 box I've got recent
Hi,
I had the same problem as you did. I dropped the pam idea and used the
mysql_ldap patch instead.
Regards,
Adi
On Sun, 5 Aug 2001, David Wright wrote:
> Does ANYONE have the following configuration working?
>
> cyrus-imapd-2.0.x authenticating via LDAP using sasl_pwcheck_method: PAM
> and t
Does ANYONE have the following configuration working?
cyrus-imapd-2.0.x authenticating via LDAP using sasl_pwcheck_method: PAM
and the pam_ldap module
If so, please chime in to say on what system and how you got it to work.
I can't imagine this configuration is obscure: LDAP is the preemininen
I have spent more time investigating the interaction of pam_ldap and
SASL, and have narrowed down the problem considerably, but still not
quite "got it".
The TLS options seem also to be the wrong direction; I can eliminate
TLS/SSL and the problem persists. By inserting lots of debug code, I
Hi,
I know configuring all this isn't so easy. In fact it's almost a lack of
documentation, I think.
Once it's compiled and configured it work preatty fine, and then you
have all features enabled for future uses or modifications (especialy
about cryptography and security).
Maybe most users sh
> Can we PLEASE produce a version of cyrus-imap imap WITHOUT SASL? PAM may
This is why I still use 1.5.mumble, with pwcheck for authentication.
Anything later was just "interesting" to get installed, and it was going
to take more interest than I as able to afford with my RealLife(tm).
> What's wrong with having both PAM and SASL in the implementation? And
> isn't this the case? I'm still using Cyrus IMAP 2.0.13 so maybe PAM
> has been removed since, but I would be surprised.
PAM has never been in the distribution. SASL is in the distribution and
PAM is supported by SASL. T
> BTW, what is the fastest route?
> imap -> sasl -> pam-ldap -> ldap server
> imap -> sasl -> ldap server
The fastest route to me seems to be:
imap -> pam_ldap -> ldap sever
Can we PLEASE produce a version of cyrus-imap imap WITHOUT SASL? PAM may
be a smidgeon less flexible, but it is simp
David Wright wrote:
>
> I am faced with the same "signaled to death by 11" problem on RH 7.1
> that has been reported in this list several times before. I think I
> understand the problem, but I need a little coaching to implement a
> solution.
>
> Here's the problem: whenever I login correctl
Use the sasl-ldap patch and bypass the problem alltogether.
BTW, what is the fastest route?
imap -> sasl -> pam-ldap -> ldap server
imap -> sasl -> ldap server
I know the last seems to be the fastest, but I thought I'd ask.
> I am using
>sasl_pwcheck_method: PAM
Yes, I have had the same pro
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 06:06:18PM -0500, Mobeen Azhar wrote:
> Is there anyone out there using procmail with cyrus imapd 2.x? I have
> not been able to use procmail since I moved to the 2.x family because
> procmail does not do lmtp delivery and I could not get cyrus' deliver to
> work.
I am us
I am faced with the same "signaled to death by 11" problem on RH 7.1
that has been reported in this list several times before. I think I
understand the problem, but I need a little coaching to implement a
solution.
Here's the problem: whenever I login correctly,
# telnet localhost imap
13 matches
Mail list logo
