[imp] Problem recognizing attatchments

2008-03-31 Thread alex . marsal
Hi everyone, I've a big issue regarding horde and attachments. I'm migrating my enterprise mail server (Notus notes 5.0) to a new one (qmail). I've used OFFLINEIMAP software to "send" the old messages to the new server. The problem is that the old mails with attachments transfered with OFFLINEI

Re: [imp] Problem recognizing attatchments

2008-03-31 Thread Joseph Brennan
Probably something wrong with the MIME headers. Show the message again with the complete header portion. Joseph Brennan Columbia University Information Technology --On Monday, March 31, 2008 11:22 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, I've a big issue regarding horde and attac

Re: [imp] Problem recognizing attatchments

2008-03-31 Thread alex . marsal
Hi Joseph, thanx for your quick answer. If that's the problem why thunderbird is able to recognize that the message has and attachment and webmail is not able? Here is another message with the complete header portion, I think you mean that part: |---+-

Re: [imp] Problem recognizing attatchments

2008-03-31 Thread alex . marsal
I think the part you mean (MIME VERSION) is missing. I've been investigating and I found something interesting (almost for me :p ) to understand where's the problem from. I come across that not every old mail transfered with OFFLINEIMAP didn't recognize the attachments. Mails that were send w

[imp] Can't login on upgrade from IMP 4.1.6 to 4.2-RC3

2008-03-31 Thread David Purdy
Hi, I'm running a ubuntu box with postfix IMAP and all that jazz. I was able to do a clean install of Horde 3.1.7 and IMP 4.1.6 and everything works fine with imp authentication. I upgraded Horde to 3.2-RC3 and everything was good When I upgraded IMP 4.2-RC3, i can no longer log in to the sui

Re: [imp] Problem recognizing attatchments

2008-03-31 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I think the part you mean (MIME VERSION) is missing. > > I've been investigating and I found something interesting (almost for me :p > ) to understand where's the problem from. > > I come across that not every old mail transfered with OFFLINEIMAP didn't > recognize the