I have spam reporting enabled. What I discovered is that
messages sent through this method are not actually being
submitted correctly. I also found through manual testing,
that the parameter '-C revoke' is not always successful. So I
changed the program line for spamc to use '-L spa
I have spam reporting enabled. What I discovered is that
messages sent through this method are not actually being
submitted correctly. I also found through manual testing, that
the parameter '-C revoke' is not always successful. So I
changed the program line for spamc to use '-L spam' an
I have spam reporting enabled. What I discovered is that
messages sent through this method are not actually being
submitted correctly. I also found through manual testing, that
the parameter '-C revoke' is not always successful. So I
changed the program line for spamc to use '-L sp
Quoting Michael J Rubinsky :
Quoting HiP-HiPpO :
I have spam reporting enabled. What I discovered is that
messages sent through this method are not actually being
submitted correctly. I also found through manual testing, that
the parameter '-C revoke' is not always successful.
Quoting HiP-HiPpO :
I have spam reporting enabled. What I discovered is that messages
sent through this method are not actually being submitted
correctly. I also found through manual testing, that the
parameter '-C revoke' is not always successful. So I changed the
program lin
I have spam reporting enabled. What I discovered is that messages
sent through this method are not actually being submitted
correctly. I also found through manual testing, that the parameter
'-C revoke' is not always successful. So I changed the program
line for spamc to use '-L
I have spam reporting enabled. What I discovered is that messages
sent through this method are not actually being submitted correctly.
I also found through manual testing, that the parameter '-C revoke'
is not always successful. So I changed the program line for spamc
to use '-L spa