-Original Message-
From: Michael M Slusarz
Sender: imp-boun...@lists.horde.org
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 23:40:16
To:
Subject: Re: [imp] Forwarding attachments
Quoting Alex May :
> Otherwise we can discuss endlessly what "forwarding" really means,
> and whether out
:16
To:
Subject: Re: [imp] Forwarding attachments
Quoting Alex May :
> Otherwise we can discuss endlessly what "forwarding" really means,
> and whether outlook is doing it wrong, but users will expect what
> they are used to.
And what users expect is to hit forward and n
Quoting Alex May :
Otherwise we can discuss endlessly what "forwarding" really means,
and whether outlook is doing it wrong, but users will expect what
they are used to.
And what users expect is to hit forward and not to have to worry about
what is being forwarded. The vast majority of u
From Alex May :
Date Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:21:29 +:
Subject Re: [imp] Forwarding attachments:
From Michael M Slusarz :
Date Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:51:48 -0700:
Subject Re: [imp] Forwarding attachments:
Quoting Alex May :
If I forward the original message as an attachment, some users
From Michael M Slusarz :
Date Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:51:48 -0700:
Subject Re: [imp] Forwarding attachments:
Quoting Alex May :
If I forward the original message as an attachment, some users
can't open the attachment and therefore can't get to the attachments.
Huh? If a mail
Quoting Alex May :
If I forward the original message as an attachment, some users can't
open the attachment and therefore can't get to the attachments.
Huh? If a mail user agent cannot read a message/rfc822 part, it is
BADLY broken. This is one of the basic MIME parts as defined in the
