-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> And I totally disagree that just because you filter into mailboxes,
> you want to poll. I have all sorts of filters setup to filter mail
> to mailboxes, and I don't want to be bothered (pressured) into
> viewing those messages (e.g. mailboxes used t
Quoting Arjen de Korte :
Citeren Michael M Slusarz :
Despite this warning, this is EXACTLY what everybody uses STATUS
for. So recent IMAP extensions have directly addressed this issue.
You should upgrade to an IMAP server that supports LIST-STATUS
(and/or mailbox stat caching) if you wa
Citeren Michael M Slusarz :
Despite this warning, this is EXACTLY what everybody uses STATUS
for. So recent IMAP extensions have directly addressed this issue.
You should upgrade to an IMAP server that supports LIST-STATUS
(and/or mailbox stat caching) if you want to see much improved
b
On 06/01/2012 11:09 AM, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> Quoting Claude Tompers :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a user with quite a large mail box (about 200 messages in the
>> inbox and a gazillion folders).
>> If he enables new mail notifications, it takes him about a minute to get
>> it's inbox displayed.
>>
Quoting Claude Tompers :
Hi,
I have a user with quite a large mail box (about 200 messages in the
inbox and a gazillion folders).
If he enables new mail notifications, it takes him about a minute to get
it's inbox displayed.
Is this normal behaviour because the system scans all folders or shoul
Hi,
I have a user with quite a large mail box (about 200 messages in the
inbox and a gazillion folders).
If he enables new mail notifications, it takes him about a minute to get
it's inbox displayed.
Is this normal behaviour because the system scans all folders or should
it be faster ?
kind regar
