Quoting Paul A Sand :
Upside: it convinced me that our bottleneck wasn't "between" IMP
and UW-IMAP, it was UW-IMAP. Even if you can't replace UW-IMAP
yourself, you might be able to use the results to convince those
other admins to do so.
The important thing to remember is that UW-IMAP was extr
Quoting Paul A Sand :
Upside: it convinced me that our bottleneck wasn't "between" IMP
and UW-IMAP, it was UW-IMAP. Even if you can't replace UW-IMAP
yourself, you might be able to use the results to convince those
other admins to do so.
The important thing to remember is that UW-IMAP was extr
Quoting Paul A Sand :
Upside: it convinced me that our bottleneck wasn't "between" IMP
and UW-IMAP, it was UW-IMAP. Even if you can't replace UW-IMAP
yourself, you might be able to use the results to convince those
other admins to do so.
The important thing to remember is that UW-IMAP was extr
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Piotr Legiecki wrote:
> What I want to do is to put work load *using* Imp4 on the mail
> server (uw-imapd) which is on another machine.
>
> I think Horde/Imp is fine, configured OK (when I test it it is
> working ok), but UW-imap is ill behaving when it sees the new Imp
> setu
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Piotr Legiecki wrote:
Jmeter tests apache, but my IMAP server is on another machine. Is this
testing environment suitable for jmeter?
It tests any web server. And you want to test your webmail frontend, no?
I don't think so ;-/
What I want to do is to put work load *usin
Zitat von Piotr Legiecki :
Jmeter tests apache, but my IMAP server is on another machine. Is
this testing environment suitable for jmeter?
It tests any web server. And you want to test your webmail frontend, no?
I don't think so ;-/
What I want to do is to put work load *using* Imp4 on t
Jmeter tests apache, but my IMAP server is on another machine. Is this
testing environment suitable for jmeter?
It tests any web server. And you want to test your webmail frontend, no?
I don't think so ;-/
What I want to do is to put work load *using* Imp4 on the mail server
(uw-imapd) whi
Zitat von Piotr Legiecki :
Jan Schneider pisze:
I know, here is my previous post:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.horde.imp/27990
The point is that the solution is not working ;-( So I'd like to
know why and to do this I need testing environment. And that is
why I need to generate the
Jan Schneider pisze:
I know, here is my previous post:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.horde.imp/27990
The point is that the solution is not working ;-( So I'd like to know
why and to do this I need testing environment. And that is why I need
to generate the load just like the people usin
Zitat von Piotr Legiecki :
Michael M Slusarz pisze:
Quoting Piotr Legiecki :
Hi
I'd like to test my new imp4.2 setup (before puting it to
production) with heavy load (lets say 100 connections). Just like
there were 100 people logged to imp. Is it possible at all?
The problem is that wh
Michael M Slusarz pisze:
Quoting Piotr Legiecki :
Hi
I'd like to test my new imp4.2 setup (before puting it to production)
with heavy load (lets say 100 connections). Just like there were 100
people logged to imp. Is it possible at all?
The problem is that when I'm testing it it is working
Quoting Piotr Legiecki :
Hi
I'd like to test my new imp4.2 setup (before puting it to
production) with heavy load (lets say 100 connections). Just like
there were 100 people logged to imp. Is it possible at all?
The problem is that when I'm testing it it is working fine, two or
three pe
Hi
I'd like to test my new imp4.2 setup (before puting it to production)
with heavy load (lets say 100 connections). Just like there were 100
people logged to imp. Is it possible at all?
The problem is that when I'm testing it it is working fine, two or three
people also does not make any di
13 matches
Mail list logo
