Re: [imp] IMP 4.3.8 problem - Tree.php

2010-10-01 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting Andre Gerhard : Hi, I have "INBOX." as namespace. When using IMP 4.3.8, if the user has no folders when he tries to login nothing is shown; this error appears in the log: PHP Fatal error: Unsupported operand types in /usr/local/www/imp4.3.8/horde/imp/lib/IMAP/Tree.php on line 333

[imp] IMP 4.3.8 problem - Tree.php

2010-10-01 Thread Andre Gerhard
Hi, I have "INBOX." as namespace. When using IMP 4.3.8, if the user has no folders when he tries to login nothing is shown; this error appears in the log: PHP Fatal error: Unsupported operand types in /usr/local/www/imp4.3.8/horde/imp/lib/IMAP/Tree.php on line 333 If the user has a folder (fo

Re: [imp] Unexpected deletion of drafts in DIMP

2010-10-01 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting Michael M Slusarz : Quoting Jan Schneider : Stationery are a good point and we might consider changing to the other camp with stationery being available in both IMP and DIMP now. Agreed. Or else, what is the purpose of stationery? That being said, stationery *isn't* available in

Re: [imp] Unexpected deletion of drafts in DIMP

2010-10-01 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting Jan Schneider : IMP has always been in the latter camp, and we shouldn't silently change this. I always had the impression that DIMP distinguishes between auto-saved drafts that are going to be deleted and manually saved draft that should stick. That would have been the ideal appr

Re: [imp] Unexpected deletion of drafts in DIMP

2010-10-01 Thread Michael M Slusarz
Quoting Ronan SALMON : I agree with Jan and Jochen. IMP/DIMP should honor IMP's auto_delete_drafts pref. There is no auto_delete_drafts pref in IMP 4. auto_delete_drafts pref was recently removed from IMP 5, but it wasn't being used anywhere. michael -- _

Re: [imp] Unexpected deletion of drafts in DIMP

2010-10-01 Thread Jan Schneider
Stationery is templates or form replies. I think the official translation is "Briefpapier" though in this context rather "Vorlagen" or "Standardantworten". "Jochen Roderburg" schrieb: >Zitat von Jan Schneider : > >> Stationery are a good point and we might consider changing to the >> other c

Re: [imp] Unexpected deletion of drafts in DIMP

2010-10-01 Thread Ronan SALMON
Jan Schneider a écrit : Zitat von Michael M Slusarz : Quoting Jochen Roderburg : Another issue upon which I stumbled again when I made my tests for the cache problem: The IMP behaviour regarding "drafts" that I know from IMP3 is: I can click on a draft in the drafts folder, get it in a co

Re: [imp] Unexpected deletion of drafts in DIMP

2010-10-01 Thread Ronan SALMON
Jan Schneider a écrit : Zitat von Michael M Slusarz : > >> Quoting Jochen Roderburg : >> >>> Another issue upon which I stumbled again when I made my tests for >>> the cache problem: >>> >>> The IMP behaviour regarding "drafts" that I know from IMP3 is: >>> I can click on a draf

Re: [imp] Unexpected deletion of drafts in DIMP

2010-10-01 Thread Jochen Roderburg
Zitat von Jan Schneider : Stationery are a good point and we might consider changing to the other camp with stationery being available in both IMP and DIMP now. OTOH there is still the use case where I want to write some mail-merge-like message, sending the same message a few times to dif