Zitat von Eric Jon Rostetter :
Quoting Jan Schneider :
I see the argument for including the code to support the hook, but not
provide his actual hook code... Then people who do want a pre-reply hook
would be able to write one (say, maybe it checks for replies to known
phishing addresses, or s
Zitat von Chuck Hagenbuch :
Quoting Eric Jon Rostetter :
We always provide examples, for a good reason. If we are going to
add that hook, we should find a useful example. If we don't find
one, then the hook doesn't make sense to me.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, I can think of a couple potent
Quoting Eric Jon Rostetter :
We always provide examples, for a good reason. If we are going to
add that hook, we should find a useful example. If we don't find
one, then the hook doesn't make sense to me.
Unless I'm misunderstanding, I can think of a couple potential ones...
And how about th
Quoting Jan Schneider :
Zitat von Eric Jon Rostetter :
Quoting Lloyd Zusman :
But this proposed "prereply" hook would be equally generic as
"postlogin", "postsent", "signature", and most of the other hooks that
already exist. People can write whatever code they want for these
existing hooks.
Quoting Jan Schneider :
I see the argument for including the code to support the hook, but not
provide his actual hook code... Then people who do want a pre-reply hook
would be able to write one (say, maybe it checks for replies to known
phishing addresses, or something else potentially useful)
Zitat von Eric Jon Rostetter :
Quoting Lloyd Zusman :
But this proposed "prereply" hook would be equally generic as
"postlogin", "postsent", "signature", and most of the other hooks that
already exist. People can write whatever code they want for these
existing hooks. Why would mine be any dif
Quoting Lloyd Zusman :
But this proposed "prereply" hook would be equally generic as
"postlogin", "postsent", "signature", and most of the other hooks that
already exist. People can write whatever code they want for these
existing hooks. Why would mine be any different?
I see the argument for
Zitat von Lloyd Zusman :
Jan Schneider horde.org> writes:
Zitat von Lloyd Zusman asfast.com>:
> [ ... ]
>
> Well, I'm just thinking of a generic hook that is run when a reply is
> requested, but before the text is presented to the user. Let's say
> this could be called "imp_hook_prereply".
Jan Schneider horde.org> writes:
>
> Zitat von Lloyd Zusman asfast.com>:
>
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > Well, I'm just thinking of a generic hook that is run when a reply is
> > requested, but before the text is presented to the user. Let's say
> > this could be called "imp_hook_prereply". Just like fo
Hi!
With Mozilla Thunderbird, everything works fine.
IMP shows all messages in one long list (all in inbox), some messages
subject and from names are strikethrought. No subfolders are shown.
How should I configure IMP to get it understand subfolders correctly?
IMP version is 4.1.6-1.el5.centos,
Zitat von Lloyd Zusman :
Jan Schneider horde.org> writes:
[ ... ]
Any clean patch that makes some sense is at least considered. There is
no strict policy, patches are considered based on the code and their
purpose.
That being said, I could imagine that it makes sense to add this as a
core f
11 matches
Mail list logo
