> Isnt Jamia Hamdard way too far off. Wonderin' how many people really
> are goin to turn up
>
> - Prateek
>
I will. dhruv will. raj will. and am sure about a dozen more may.
let us know who else is turning up, in single-line, emails please.
LL
===
This is an RFC 1153 digest.
(1 message)
--
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: KG Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fsf-friends] Unilever switching to GNU\Linu
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, vivek wrote:
> wanted to ask, are we registered as a society or is it still pending?
The tedious process is underway. Expect a formal response anyday :) Though
that day might be fr off in the future...but what the hell, keep
expecting.
> secondly, why are all the links
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, LinuxLingam wrote:
> is there anyone out there who would like to start working/developoing QCAD
> further? this could be another project we could initiate at linux-delhi under
> the gpl.
Well, i know nothing about CAD and the software etc. But if someone can
sit and explai
> i have just picked one issue:
Which "one" issue please restate it for my benefit.
> let's just focus on this, see it from start to finish,
I wish you said that earlier.
Tarun Dua
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
LinuxLingam wrote:
> let us know who else is turning up, in single-line, emails please.
perhaps, this time i would also be interested.
--
\|||/
(o o)
ooO-(_)-Ooo-
| vivek
Hi Folks !
LinuxLingam wrote:
I will. dhruv will. raj will. and am sure about a dozen more may.
let us know who else is turning up, in single-line, emails please.
LL
I will come for the meet.
I also have an idea for a project. I am not sure abt this but AFAIK a
Concurrency Library for C++ does
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Gagan Grewal wrote:
> I also have an idea for a project. I am not sure abt this but AFAIK a
> Concurrency Library for C++ doesn't exist.
> The basic idea is to encapsulate LWPs inside Objects ... Lalit Seth and
> I are willing to take this up. More volunteers
Could you plea
Making such an effort is a great thing. But take note that addressing it
as Light Weight Process LWP's is not really applicable in linux.
(reasons)
1) Kernel is involved in case initialization of thread through syscall
clone(2)
2) you see threads as seprate entities in process tree.
3) Resource cos
Hi !
supreet wrote:
Making such an effort is a great thing. But take note that addressing it
as Light Weight Process LWP's is not really applicable in linux.
(reasons)
OK ... sorry ... I shud've written clone() ... thanks for correcting me :)
1) Kernel is involved in case initialization of thread
10 matches
Mail list logo
