Re: [LIP] Re: [ilugd]: readings logs

2002-03-31 Thread Varun Varma
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 12:28:15PM +0530, Sapan J . Bhatia spoke out thus: > // > Yes, they do, and they'd be more or less the same. It's only that one usually > // > makes the assumption that wakeup operations in kernel space, based on > // > wait_queues/sems/interrupts are more efficient than de

Re: [LIP] Re: [ilugd]: readings logs

2002-03-31 Thread Sapan J . Bhatia
Varun, I think the main problem is this - and it's the only one I'm addressing here. You're assuming that when a process is waiting with a poll(2) (effectively sleeping with a schedule_timeout with TASK_INTERRUPTABLE), the only way it has of knowing that new data is available is by che

[ilugd]: MRTG problem

2002-03-31 Thread ashotosh kaul
Hello all, I have to configure mrtg on our local network i downloaded the mrtg rpm from net and installed it . now when i run the cfgmaker file it gives the output as mentioned below i am not able to make out anything from the output.please help in this regard as i am not able to solve the problem

Re: [ilugd]: MRTG problem

2002-03-31 Thread Kishore Bhargava
Have you actually got snmpd running and a configured snmpd.conf?? Cheers...Kishore -- A lot of people I know believe in positive thinking, and so do I. I believe everything positively stinks. -- Lew Col To subscribe, s