Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-25 Thread Karthikeyan A.K
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Priyanka Sarkar wrote: > > On 24/07/13 12:19, Karthikeyan A.K wrote: > > Hello People, > > > > Just want to know is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist. I > see > > that people are greeting more interested in software and are quiet > > forgetting what ma

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-25 Thread Priyanka Sarkar
On 24/07/13 12:19, Karthikeyan A.K wrote: > Hello People, > > Just want to know is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist. I see > that people are greeting more interested in software and are quiet > forgetting what makes software really run. > > I am also quiet ashamed that many electroni

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Mohan R
> --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Krishna wrote: > | I would like to have it here, otherwise i dont prefer it. Hi Krishna, I too love to have a group with lot of open electronics enthusiasts who can share interesting things happening in electronics world to guys like me (I'm from CS backgr

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Krishna wrote: | Neither can you conclude!! \-- Sure, can, because the F/OSS licenses are clearly defined, and widely used. Unfortunately, different proprietary tool vendors have their own terms and conditions. --- | Hey, Come on, Everyone knows how to

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Krishna
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Hi, > > --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Krishna > wrote: > | Also with other closed software when it comes to libraries you have that > | freedom, still its worth mentioning. > \-- > > It depends on their terms and conditions. We cann

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:18 PM, Krishna wrote: | Also with other closed software when it comes to libraries you have that | freedom, still its worth mentioning. \-- It depends on their terms and conditions. We cannot generalize. --- | Yes thats fine, But in this context!, I do know so

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Krishna
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Hi, > > --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Krishna > wrote: > | > There are symbol libraries available at: > | > > | > http://www.gedasymbols.org/ > | > | I dont recommend unless i myself have used it, have you? > \-- > > The URL is a

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Krishna wrote: | > There are symbol libraries available at: | > | > http://www.gedasymbols.org/ | | I dont recommend unless i myself have used it, have you? \-- The URL is a reference on what exists. With F/OSS, you have the freedom to create your own

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Krishna
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Hi, > > --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Krishna wrote: > | I am not sure if it has enough footprint libraries, yet the software is > | good. > \-- > > There are symbol libraries available at: > > http://www.gedasymbols.org/ > I dont

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Krishna
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Abraham Vinod wrote: > If no one knows of any group, we could create one? I m pretty sure IITM's > CFI team can help a lot in this regard. > > There is no need for a new group, I find ILUGC as best may it be embedded or web or anything else, well thats my opinion.

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Krishna wrote: | I am not sure if it has enough footprint libraries, yet the software is | good. \-- There are symbol libraries available at: http://www.gedasymbols.org/ With F/OSS, you can also create your own: http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:g

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Krishna
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Hi, > > --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Krishna wrote: > | KiCAD is the open source > | alternative, although its in development, I hear that its getting better. > \-- > > There are few others too: > > * gEDA suite: > > http://www.ge

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Raja Rajan
i am also eager to contribute if we can create a group in team On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Krishna wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Karthikeyan A.K >wrote: > > > Hello People, > > > > Just want to know is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist. I > see > > that people are

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Krishna wrote: | KiCAD is the open source | alternative, although its in development, I hear that its getting better. \-- There are few others too: * gEDA suite: http://www.geda-project.org/ http://pcb.geda-project.org/ * Fritzing: http://fritz

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Abraham Vinod
If no one knows of any group, we could create one? I m pretty sure IITM's CFI team can help a lot in this regard. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Krishna wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Karthikeyan A.K >wrote: > > > Hello People, > > > > Just want to know is there any group for Indi

Re: [Ilugc] Is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist

2013-07-24 Thread Krishna
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Karthikeyan A.K wrote: > Hello People, > > Just want to know is there any group for Indian Electronic Hobbyist. I see > that people are greeting more interested in software and are quiet > forgetting what makes software really run. > > I am also quiet ashamed that