Dear Jim,
I agree with you. I am on what I believe to be the last "hurdle" of my
grammar:
(simplified)
grammar conjunctive;//using ANTLRWorks
englishSentence : (adverbPhrase ','?)* simpleSentence;
adverbPhrase: 'con' simpleSentence | prepPhr;
simpleSentence : nounPhra
Hot Girls Lost Alone in Forest Having Oral Sex
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
Click Here to View Full Collections
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
http://w
> Johannes,
>
> Is there some trick to getting the CSharp2 runtime to behave like Java in
> error recovery/detection? The MissingToken and extraneous token stuff is
> never called because the Mismatch() routine is commented out in the runtime.
> So basically all you ever get is an NVA, whereas Ja
Yes, I alluded to that in another thread, "How to make a syntactic predicate
exit a rule completely". I am a beginner in this area, but I think that what
you said is true of syntactic predicates as well. I think it would make
ANTLR more powerful, if this feature existed (of not matching a rule if a
I didn't even notice. :)
Also, feel free to prod any time you don't get an answer. I don't take
offense - my day to day is pretty crazy since I'm a grad student so
things slip around all the time. If you don't want to prod on the list,
you can always send me messages directly.
-Original Mess
xxx indian girls xxx click here
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
xxx indian girls xxx click here
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
xxx indian girls xxx click here
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
xxx indian girls xxx click here
http://www.banatmsr.com/a7a/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
Hi everyone,
Here's a status update that I know many people are asking for. For each
portion, I'll talk about the status of the code in Perforce. At the end,
I'll talk about the status of the posted binaries.
Basic Status
StringTemplate and the ANTLR Tool: Up-to-date with the Java versi
I have two parser rules in my grammar where I am trying to wrap the
complete, concatenated text of a series of tokens into a single token for a
tree grammar. The rules look like this:
*#1:*
cell : (~(VBAR|EOL))* ;
in this case I would like to write something like this:
cell : (~(VBAR|EOL))* ->
Good day,
I have the rule
myRule[returns Type1 res] :
rule1, rule2, rule3, rule4... ruleN { res = f($rule1, $rule2,..., ,
$ruleN) }
;
it's all ok.
BUT if ruleN will fire exception, rule1, rule2.. rule(N-1) subtrees will
be forgotten!!!
How can I manage such situations?? can you write me right
I'm not entirely sure I understand the particulars of what you're trying to do
but...
At 10/18/2009 05:01 PM, Jeffrey Cameron wrote:
>
> I have two parser rules in my grammar where I am trying to wrap the complete,
> concatenated text of a series of tokens into a single token for a tree
> grammar
Dear Jim,
I've solved it!
I did so as follows:
(simplified)
grammar conjunctive;//using ANTLRWorks
englishSentence : (adverbPhrase ','?)* simpleSentence;
adverbPhrase: 'con' simpleSentence | prepPhr;
simpleSentence : nounPhrase verbPhrase;
no
11 matches
Mail list logo