I'm not sure if this is the right forum to discuss a little problem I
encountered in section 12.5 of Language Design Patterns (B6.0), but
I'm sure this is the most likely spot for some help...I got the
following:
java -cp antlr-3.1.3.jar org.antlr.Tool Cymbol.g Gen.g
warning(200): Cymbol.g:94
Hi,
Indyarocks has sent you a link to a video "Just For Laughs Gags Nature
Calls" and the following message:
- Just For Laughs Gags Nature Calls
Link: http://www.indyarocks.com/videos/videos_mail.php?vid=TVRRd01qTTBNamsx
Have fun
Your Team
@Indyarocks
*Please note:* This message was sent t
[_!_] Free useful articels for Important Software Applications [_!_]
http://www.rabinath.weebly.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to il-a
BEST ANIMALS PICTURES
IN THE WORLD
MUST SEE !!
http://alltypeofanimals.blogspot.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-interest@
BEST ANIMALS PICTURES
IN THE WORLD
MUST SEE !!
http://alltypeofanimals.blogspot.com/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-interest@
cool. see you at the conference. I'm pretty sure I used to run -target
jsr14 on the releases I made earlier. Neil Gafter, the javac guy, told
me it works
Ter
On Aug 31, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Jim Idle wrote:
> Pretty sure we can't even though genetics are eluded at the byte code
> level. I will
Pretty sure we can't even though genetics are eluded at the byte code
level. I will look at this definitively next week and we can decide
what to do at the JVM language conference.
Jim
On Aug 31, 2009, at 7:14 PM, Terence Parr wrote:
> Hi. can we do 1.5 javac with -target jsr14?
> Ter
> On
Hi. can we do 1.5 javac with -target jsr14?
Ter
On Aug 31, 2009, at 3:30 PM, Gordon Tyler wrote:
> Thanks Steve, and Jim Idle who replied off-list. I guess I'll have
> to stick to Antlr v2 until my project drops the JDK 1.4 requirement.
> Messing around with retro-weaver sounds dubious and I
Thanks Steve, and Jim Idle who replied off-list. I guess I'll have to stick to
Antlr v2 until my project drops the JDK 1.4 requirement. Messing around with
retro-weaver sounds dubious and I need to restrict my third-party dependencies.
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ebersole [mailto:stev
I ran into the same issue when first looking at Antlr3. I was told the
intention was to not have the Antlr runtime rely on JDK 1.5; but
unfortunately some JDK 1.5 features ended up getting exposed.
The outcome of my queries, iirc, was that it would just remain JDK 1.5
compatible. You could pro
Is it possible to use the Antlr v3 runtime with JDK 1.4? I'm getting this error
when compiling generated parser code using JDK 1.4, which indicates that the
runtime is compiled with JDK 1.5:
NewTransformLexer.java:11: cannot access org.antlr.runtime.Lexer
bad class file: lib\antlr-runtime-3.1.3.
Hi,
I'm writing a grammar which needs more than one lexer (token scope). I
just found a document from ANTLR 2 documents which explains using
"selector" for this purpose.
Is this approach still valid for ANTLR 3? and should I make different
files for different lexers?
When there are
" Earn money by single clicks very easy to earn "
http://www.rabinath.weebly.com
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to il-antlr-int
As far as I understood (respectively experienced), tokText is not always
set. You probably want to do this:
char* tok_text = (token->getText(token) != NULL) ?
token->getText(token)->chars : token->tokText.chars;
At least that's what I'm doing to get the same result as
token.toString() in Java.
14 matches
Mail list logo
