Dave Thomas is a reasonable guy, what is his take on this?
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Terence Parr wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:59 PM, C. Mundi wrote:
>
> >
> > Terence,
> >
> > After reading the entire manuscript, the original, "Language Design
> > Patterns," seems more appropriate
On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:59 PM, C. Mundi wrote:
>
> Terence,
>
> After reading the entire manuscript, the original, "Language Design
> Patterns," seems more appropriate than ever. Many sections feel
> like Language (Design Patterns) and others feel like (Language
> Design) Patterns. So I sa
Terence,
After reading the entire manuscript, the original, "Language Design
Patterns," seems more appropriate than ever. Many sections feel like
Language (Design Patterns) and others feel like (Language Design) Patterns.
So I say you can claim the associative ambiguity as a "feature." :)
Inste
How about:
Building Languages -
ANTLR Patterns for Domain-Specific Languages
Cheers,
c.
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rec
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Nicola Musatti wrote:
>
> "Pattern Oriented Language Engineering" - Maybe a little too reminiscent
> of the Pattern Oriented Software Architecture series, but don't you love
> the POLE acronym? That would call for a white bear on the book cover :-)
Indeed. Titl
Terence Parr wrote:
> The confusion is that the current title can be seen as about lang
> design. We could do Lang Impl Patterns, but Kent Beck has a Impl
> Patterns book now that is totally different concept.
>
> Publisher wants DSL in there somewhere. Any ideas about title/subtitle?
>
I
I suggest that you do not pick XHTML as your first grammar as it is
too convoluted and you will get frustrated. Read the getting started
guides on the wiki. I see othrs have answered these specific things.
Jim
On Aug 28, 2009, at 3:42 AM, stephane richard wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm trying to
At 8/28/2009 09:16 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
>On 28/08/2009, at 6:25 AM, Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote:
>> you'd hardly be the first to port the idea to
>> another domain.
>
>Someone's even done it with Architecture (he uses the term to refer to
>buildings, not computer systems too -- doubly confusing!)
On 28/08/2009, at 6:25 AM, Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote:
> you'd hardly be the first to port the idea to
> another domain.
Someone's even done it with Architecture (he uses the term to refer to
buildings, not computer systems too -- doubly confusing!)
I like "Programming Language Construction : P
At 20:42 28/08/2009, stephane richard wrote:
>text_element
> : (~(OPEN_TAG) | WS)+
> ;
[...]
>NEWLINE : '\r'? '\n' ;
>WS: (' '|'\t'|'\n'|'\r')+ {skip();} ;
Given that you are skipping whitespace (although not individual
newlines for some bizarre r
Hi all.
I'm trying to build a simple xhtml recognizer (for whitespace
compression) in the purpose of learning antlr. Here's a sample of what
I like to match :
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
XHTML
Example
What about 'Language Building Blocks'? Or maybe: 'Language Design
Building Blocks', though that's longer.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Terence Parr wrote:
> Hi, so we're going back and forth on titles/subtitles for the new book
> on implementing DSLs and other languages. Now, we're "Language
Terence Parr wrote:
> Hi, so we're going back and forth on titles/subtitles for the new book
> on implementing DSLs and other languages. Now, we're "Language Design
> Patterns", where Design is an adjective of Patterns; Language is not
> an adj of Design. it's ambiguous though. Using Lang
13 matches
Mail list logo
