Re: [Ietf-dkim] Misuse of antiforgery protocols

2022-11-30 Thread Mark Alley
That's a question I've always had on this topic. Is 5322.FROM an acceptable long-term workaround for DMARC enforced domains? The community in general seems to be split on 5322.FROM munging and it's use in practice. On 11/30/2022 12:41 AM, Barry Leiba wrote: Unless I’m misunderstanding you’re

Re: [Ietf-dkim] What makes this posting different from the original posting?

2023-08-30 Thread Mark Alley
o their users specifically, but for these companies, they've decided the benefits outweigh the risks in terms of any legitimate mail blocked. - Mark Alley ___ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim

[Ietf-dkim] Re: ELI5: DKIM2 and DMARC

2025-03-21 Thread Mark Alley
On 3/21/2025 10:12 AM, Todd Herr wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:05 AM Mark Alley wrote: If Joe Schmoe, an email administrator, signs corporate mail with DKIM2 but have other mail streams that may not support it, or legacy systems incapable of using it, would not DMARC still be

[Ietf-dkim] Re: ELI5: DKIM2 and DMARC

2025-03-25 Thread Mark Alley
entities trying to spoof the domain? I've perused the draft, and unless I'm missing text somewhere, I don't see where DKIM2 would fulfill the policy request for unauthenticated emails, unless you're saying that DKIM2 usage (or lack thereof) would be akin to ADSP-esque behavior i

[Ietf-dkim] Re: Review Response #2: DKIM replay

2025-04-14 Thread Mark Alley
company's email domain reputation intentionally as a form of email DoS. - Mark Alley ___ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-dkim-le...@ietf.org