Hi!
On 07.11.2024 22:10, Jim Fenton wrote:
On 7 Nov 2024, at 18:21, Mark E. Mallett wrote:
To gain widespread adoption, it is expected that design proposals will
be tested during the development of specifications. The working group
will favor designs that are tested at scale and may dism
Francesco,
I stand corrected. I *do* see the Bcc with GMail, but not with
sendmail. I don't know what other systems are doing.
Eliot
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
Hang on a second:
On 20.04.2025 09:49, Dave Crocker wrote:
It is important to /retain/ the BCC field, for display to the
recipient, since it is the only way the recipient can tell why they
got the message. (and probably that they should not do a reply all.)
What system actually does this? F
&TL;DR Good start; absent a bit more formality, it is hard to understand
how to implement the work.
I really like the goals laid out in this work. The original DKIM
couldn't accomplish what was being proposed, in particular
reversibility. I am excited about your direction, and I'm convinced
The only proxy we have to address this difference is whether people are
willing to *deploy*.
Eliot
On 14.05.2025 16:07, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 5/13/2025 8:15 AM, John R Levine wrote:
However, how does a list know which subscribers have a DKIM2 verifier?
They don't know, but I figure that's
