[Ietf-dkim] Re: Charter #4?

2025-01-22 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Jim Fenton wrote in <02500ef2-7a55-44e8-b796-365baf523...@bluepopcorn.net>: |On 20 Jan 2025, at 16:49, Richard Clayton wrote: |> not really ... the issue that had been overlooked relates to a good |> sender who hires someone to send their mail. One of the destinations |> fails and the report

[Ietf-dkim] Re: Charter #4?

2025-01-22 Thread Bron Gondwana
Thanks Murray. Sorry I haven't got back on this, I've been on vacation with my parents in Tasmania, where the weather has been beautiful :) I like your wordsmithing - it says similar things with different words that might be clearer to the people who need to understand what we're doing. I agre

[Ietf-dkim] IETF DKIM configuration (Was: Re: Charter #4?)

2025-01-22 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hello. I finally want to remark two things about the IETF mailing-list configuration also directly to support@. For one, this is the list of DKIM protected header fields: h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject: List-Id:List-Archive: List-Help:List-Owner:List-Post: List-Subscribe

[Ietf-dkim] Re: Charter #4?

2025-01-22 Thread Richard Clayton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message , Murray S. Kucherawy writes >I've uploaded the charter, which I found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dkim/ for the record, I think this is suitable for moving forward - -- richard